2012
DOI: 10.5194/acp-12-5537-2012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DO<sub>3</sub>SE modelling of soil moisture to determine ozone flux to forest trees

Abstract: Abstract. The DO3SE (Deposition of O3 for Stomatal Exchange) model is an established tool for estimating ozone (O3) deposition, stomatal flux and impacts to a variety of vegetation types across Europe. It has been embedded within the EMEP (European Monitoring and Evaluation Programme) photochemical model to provide a policy tool capable of relating the flux-based risk of vegetation damage to O3 precursor emission scenarios for use in policy formulation. A key limitation of regional flux-based risk assessments … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
78
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 139 publications
(133 reference statements)
2
78
0
Order By: Relevance
“…That new function is being increasingly used, but more knowledge is needed to determine if the effects of O3 on trees should really be integrated in the same way as to link the O3 function to another function than phenology function so far. Further research is needed (i) to characterize O 3 impacts on stomatal function as well as the interaction with other abiotic stresses like drought and (ii) to improve stomatal conductance models like the DO3SE model (Büker et al 2012). In these models, we need to improve the estimation of the start and end of the growing season today and in the future.…”
Section: Leaf Damagementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…That new function is being increasingly used, but more knowledge is needed to determine if the effects of O3 on trees should really be integrated in the same way as to link the O3 function to another function than phenology function so far. Further research is needed (i) to characterize O 3 impacts on stomatal function as well as the interaction with other abiotic stresses like drought and (ii) to improve stomatal conductance models like the DO3SE model (Büker et al 2012). In these models, we need to improve the estimation of the start and end of the growing season today and in the future.…”
Section: Leaf Damagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…An alternative, flux-based methodology emerged from the International Cooperative Programme on the effects of air pollution on vegetation (Mills et al 2013) under the UNECE Convention on Long-Range Transboundary Air Pollution (LRTAP). In this approach, the European Monitoring and Evaluation Program (EMEP) and Rossby Centre Regional Climate (RCA3) models provided O 3 and meteorological input data that fed the Deposition of Ozone for Stomatal Exchange (DO 3 SE) model, which simulates O 3 dry deposition (Büker et al 2012) and subsequently O 3 stomatal fluxes and phytotoxic O 3 doses (POD Y ) as described in the LRTAP convention manual (2010). O 3 flux-response relationships were applied to calculate biomass and carbon losses for tree species groups and representative species.…”
Section: O 3 -Induced Signalling In Treesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Calculation of non-stomatal sinks, in conjunction with an ecosystemspecific calculation of vertical O 3 profiles, is an important part of this calculation, as discussed in Tuovinen et al (2004Tuovinen et al ( , 2009 or Simpson et al (2003). The methodology and robustness of the calculations of O 3 deposition and stomatal conductance have been explored in a number of publications (Tuovinen et al, 2004(Tuovinen et al, , 2009Emberson et al, 2007;Büker et al, 2012). …”
Section: Model Set-upmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whether it is possible to separate the components of R ns (R c2 -external surfaces; R c3 -soil; R c4 -in-canopy chemistry) depends on the nature of the measurement site and canopy, and there are some models available based on measurements over bare soil, senescent vegetation and in-canopy chemistry (Launiainen et al, 2013;Fares et al, 2013bFares et al, , 2012Büker et al, 2012;Tuzet et al, 2011;Stella et al, 2011). Many research groups have taken this approach, and Table 1 provides a summary of some of the different estimates of the values for R ns in the literature.…”
Section: B Non-stomatal Uptakementioning
confidence: 99%