2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.pursup.2008.10.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Do all suppliers dislike electronic reverse auctions?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
38
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(54 reference statements)
0
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[12]. On the other hand, ORA cannot replace traditional methods of setting prices for every product or service, especially if the product or service cannot be clearly specified beforehand [25].…”
Section: Barriers Of the Applicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[12]. On the other hand, ORA cannot replace traditional methods of setting prices for every product or service, especially if the product or service cannot be clearly specified beforehand [25].…”
Section: Barriers Of the Applicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, ORA is hosted by a server hosting operator, who also provides the necessary user support, hotline, etc. Some buyers are worried about the unwillingness of current suppliers to participate in ORAs [25]. This unwillingness results from a fear of losing the contract, or keeping the contract at terms that are less advantageous for the incumbent supplier.…”
Section: Barriers Of the Applicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to [27], four bidders already create a sufficiently strong competitive environment in the auction. Besides savings, auctions are also beneficial by contributing to time savings [6] and making the purchasing process more transparent [5]. On the other hand, e-RAs may harm the buyer-supplier relationship [6] and a significant fall in the bid price may be associated (during the construction phase) with a decrease of the quality of delivery.…”
Section: E-ra Applicability and Related Benefits And Barriersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(i) a reduction in the ability to build long term relationships (Smeltzer and Carr, 2003;Emiliani, 2004); (ii) pressures on incumbent suppliers to reduce their price with no guarantee of gaining new business (Van Tulder and Mol, 2002;Smeltzer and Carr, 2003;Emiliani, 2004;Caniëls and van Raaij, 2009); (iii) perceptions of opportunism and coercion that the use of RAs can create among participating suppliers (Jap, 2001;Smeltzer and Carr, 2002; Several papers provide guidelines on the best use of RAs, with particular focus on the potential pitfalls (Schoenherr and Mabert, 2007;Schoenherr, 2008;Hawkins, Gravier et al, 2010). To address the appropriateness of using RAs, Hawkins et al (2010) suggest that sourcing managers consider the strategic factors (e.g.…”
Section: Reverse Auctionsmentioning
confidence: 99%