2022
DOI: 10.1177/21925682221074660
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Do Age-Related Variations Of Sagittal Alignment Rely On SpinoPelvic Organization? An Observational Study Of 1540 Subjects

Abstract: Study design Descriptive radiographic analysis of a prospective multi-center database. Objective This study aims to provide normative values of spinopelvic parameters and their correlations according to age and pelvic incidence (PI) of subjects without spinal deformity. Methods After Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval, 1540 full spine radiographs were analyzed. Subjects were divided into 3 groups of PI: low PI < 45°, intermediate PI 45–60°, high PI > 60°, and then stratified by age (20–34, 35–49, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(53 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other parameters of the equation also vary over age: LL decreases and PT increases as degenerative changes occur in the lumbar spine, whereas PI also tends to increase in the elderly. [21][22][23] This reflects the typical modifications of sagittal parameters with age, as previously described. 19,[21][22][23][24][25] In a cohort of Japanese adults, average values of sagittal alignment parameters 24 were: 50°± 11 for LL, 54°± 11 for PI, 14°± 8 for PT, and 39°± 8 for SS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Other parameters of the equation also vary over age: LL decreases and PT increases as degenerative changes occur in the lumbar spine, whereas PI also tends to increase in the elderly. [21][22][23] This reflects the typical modifications of sagittal parameters with age, as previously described. 19,[21][22][23][24][25] In a cohort of Japanese adults, average values of sagittal alignment parameters 24 were: 50°± 11 for LL, 54°± 11 for PI, 14°± 8 for PT, and 39°± 8 for SS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…[21][22][23] This reflects the typical modifications of sagittal parameters with age, as previously described. 19,[21][22][23][24][25] In a cohort of Japanese adults, average values of sagittal alignment parameters 24 were: 50°± 11 for LL, 54°± 11 for PI, 14°± 8 for PT, and 39°± 8 for SS. Our results were similar for SS, PI, PT, LL, whereas TK was higher in our cohort (45°±13 vs 36°± 10).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, in the normal population, a greater lordosis contribution of the upper lumbar curve might be associated with a larger PI and SS, and vice versa. The association of PI with proximal lumbar lordosis (PLL) and distal lumbar lordosis (DLL) has become a research interest recent years (Pesenti et al, 2018; Prost et al, 2022). However, there might be a closer correlation between PI and the internal structure in PLL and DLL.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prost et al examined the correlation between age and sagittal alignment of the spine in asymptomatic volunteers 57 . They found that, in individuals with low PI, there was a global decrease in LL in both cephalad and caudal segments; in contrast, in individuals with high PI, more prominent loss of caudal lordosis was associated with increased PT and more prominent loss of cephalad lordosis was associated with increasing kyphosis and positive sagittal malalignment 57 . These findings have important implications and call for thorough assessment of PI and caudal and cephalad lordosis, with a surgical plan that aims to restore appropriate segmental lordosis based on spinopelvic anatomy 58 .…”
Section: Impact Of Age and Degeneration On Llmentioning
confidence: 99%