2012
DOI: 10.1080/17439760.2012.690444
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Do actions speak louder than words? Differential effects of apology and restitution on behavioral and self-report measures of forgiveness

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
45
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
2
45
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In UG, when subjects encountered an unfair opponent's proposal, they feel that they were offended or unfairly treated and that their self-interest was damaged, which caused negative emotions (Sanfey et al, 2003). Similarly, Carlisle et al (2012) found that subjects in offense conditions felt less positive and more negative emotions after experiencing the unequal distribution of raffle tickets in Round 1 compared with the subjects in the no offense condition, which was consistent with the feelings experienced by participants during UG. In addition, the subjects' happiness decreased after DG compared with the emotional states at baseline.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In UG, when subjects encountered an unfair opponent's proposal, they feel that they were offended or unfairly treated and that their self-interest was damaged, which caused negative emotions (Sanfey et al, 2003). Similarly, Carlisle et al (2012) found that subjects in offense conditions felt less positive and more negative emotions after experiencing the unequal distribution of raffle tickets in Round 1 compared with the subjects in the no offense condition, which was consistent with the feelings experienced by participants during UG. In addition, the subjects' happiness decreased after DG compared with the emotional states at baseline.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…The first stage was the adapted "UG" in which the participants would experience offense or unfair treatment and then observe the allocation proposal of participants made in the adapted "DG" as indexes of forgiveness or not. Previous studies have found that the behavioral measure paradigm of forgiveness can induce the same offensive feelings as in the real environment and has a significant positive correlation with individuals' self-reported trait forgiveness (Sanfey et al, 2003;Harlé et al, 2010;Carlisle et al, 2012;Dorn et al, 2014;Gilam et al, 2019). On this basis, we made two hypotheses: (1) after completing the adapted UG, participants would express emotional fluctuation because of the unfair experience; and (2) participants with high self-control would give a more fair distribution to opponents who previously treated them unfairly than those with low self-control.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An emerging literature provides evidence that victims are more forgiving if they receive an apology (see Fehr et al, 2010) or restitution (Carlisle et al, 2012;Witvliet et al, 2020) or both in combination (Kiefer et al, 2020). The present investigation extends this work by also examining emotional and embodied responses to apology and restitution, with implications for the growing literature on forgiveness and its physiological side effects as health pathways (Witvliet et al, in press) 1 .…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…In experiments using a burglary scenario with both students and a community sample, Witvliet et al (2020) found that experimental manipulations of apology and restitution independently prompted greater self-reported empathy and forgiveness while decreasing unforgiving motivations such as avoidance and revenge. Carlisle et al (2012) found self-reported and behavioral evidence that apology and restitution each prompted forgiveness-consistent responses for a lab study offense of unfair raffle ticket distribution. Specifically, receiving an apology note prompted higher self-reported forgiveness, and receiving restitution prompted a behavioral forgiveness-oriented response (i.e., higher distribution of raffle tickets).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…For example, Kim et al (2004)'s experiment in scenario shows that when trust violation competence based occurs, the apology's repair effect of trustor's belief on trustee is better than denial. Carlisle et al (2012) found that apology leads to more forgiveness. That is to say, participants were more willing to forgive those who make an apology response in the attitude.…”
Section: Apologymentioning
confidence: 99%