2022
DOI: 10.1017/jfm.2022.265
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DNS of passive scalars in turbulent pipe flow

Abstract: We study the statistics of passive scalars at $Pr=1$ , for turbulent flow within a smooth straight pipe of circular cross section up to $Re_{\tau } \approx 6000$ using direct numerical simulation (DNS) of the Navier–Stokes equations. While featuring a general organisation similar to the axial velocity field, passive scalar fields show additional energy at small wavenumbers, resulting in a higher degree of mixing and in a $k^{-4/3}$ … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
39
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
(143 reference statements)
6
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of the uncertainty estimation analysis are very similar to those reported in Pirozzoli et al. (2022), and are not reported here. Basically, the estimated sampling and discretization errors are for the Nusselt number, for the channel centreline temperature, and for the peak temperature variance.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The results of the uncertainty estimation analysis are very similar to those reported in Pirozzoli et al. (2022), and are not reported here. Basically, the estimated sampling and discretization errors are for the Nusselt number, for the channel centreline temperature, and for the peak temperature variance.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Additional tests aimed at establishing the effect of streamwise domain length and grid size have been carried out for the DNS-C flow case. The results of the uncertainty estimation analysis are very similar to those reported in Pirozzoli et al (2022), and are not reported here. Basically, the estimated sampling and discretization errors are 0.2 % for the Nusselt number, 0.4 % for the channel centreline temperature, and 0.7 % for the peak temperature variance.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 82%
See 3 more Smart Citations