2014
DOI: 10.4236/ojfd.2014.43022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DNS Analysis on the Indirect Relationship between the Local Burning Velocity and the Flame Displacement Speed of Turbulent Premixed Flames

Abstract: The local burning velocity and the flame displacement speed are the dominant properties in the mechanism of turbulent premixed combustion. The flame displacement speed and the local burning velocity have been investigated separately, because the flame displacement speed can be used for the discussion of flame-turbulence interactions and the local burning velocity can be used for the discussion of the inner structure of turbulent premixed flames. In this study, to establish the basis for the discussion on the e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 36 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that very low peaks around 0.5 in case Mm and Mh are due to little inaccurate integration nearby the boundary of the computational domain. According to the other work [15], the reason why the profiles and modes of the pdfs were dependent on Lewis number was the deviation of the local chemical reaction rates along normal to the flame surface with the different Lewis numbers. In all Lewis number cases, the pdfs of Range 1 and Range 2 were almost the same profiles.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Note that very low peaks around 0.5 in case Mm and Mh are due to little inaccurate integration nearby the boundary of the computational domain. According to the other work [15], the reason why the profiles and modes of the pdfs were dependent on Lewis number was the deviation of the local chemical reaction rates along normal to the flame surface with the different Lewis numbers. In all Lewis number cases, the pdfs of Range 1 and Range 2 were almost the same profiles.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%