2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.08.067
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DNA vaccines against leptospirosis: A literature review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
59
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 96 publications
1
59
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The immunity of Leptospira is serovar-specific and there are so many types of serovars present worldwide therefore multivalent bacterin formulations having locally prevalent serovar are used for immunization of cattle, pigs, and dogs worldwide (Bolin et al, 1991). Some recombinant vaccines based on outer membrane proteins, leptospira immunoglobuline-like proteins, and lipoproteins of leptospira were also experimentally evaluated but none of them are available for immunization purpose (Silveira et al, 2017;Faine et al, 1999;Levett, 2001).…”
Section: Leptospirosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The immunity of Leptospira is serovar-specific and there are so many types of serovars present worldwide therefore multivalent bacterin formulations having locally prevalent serovar are used for immunization of cattle, pigs, and dogs worldwide (Bolin et al, 1991). Some recombinant vaccines based on outer membrane proteins, leptospira immunoglobuline-like proteins, and lipoproteins of leptospira were also experimentally evaluated but none of them are available for immunization purpose (Silveira et al, 2017;Faine et al, 1999;Levett, 2001).…”
Section: Leptospirosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These vaccines have been shown to elicit a robust cytotoxic T cell in comparison with subunit vaccines. Also, DNA vaccine has the capacity to induce both cellular and humoral immune responses by utilizing MHC I and MHC II antigen presentation by DCs [1][2][3]. Although DNA vaccines are licensed for use in veterinary vaccines since 2005, they have their own limitation due to low transfection efficiency.…”
Section: Dna Vaccinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although DNA vaccines are licensed for use in veterinary vaccines since 2005, they have their own limitation due to low transfection efficiency. As a result, they perform poorly in human clinical trials and require multiple booster doses to achieve desirable immune response [2,4,5]. With the advent of new adjuvant systems such as nanoparticles, the immunogenicity of DNA vaccines can be enhanced considerably [1].…”
Section: Dna Vaccinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…NPs can induce a robust innate immunity response by causing abundant initial antigen exposure and long-term immunity through the sustained release of antigens via two types of activation modes: dendritic cell (DC) and T-cell differentiation. (12,13,14) In previous studies, we demonstrated that subunit vaccines containing recombinant proteins, LipL32 (10) and LigAni, (11) with halloysite nanotubes (HNTs) and carboxylated multi-walled carbon nanotubes (COOH-MWCNTs) as carriers induced a strong IgG immune response in Golden Syrian hamsters.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(16,17,18) Over the last two decades, to increase the efficacy of vaccines against leptospirosis, several DNA vaccines have been formulated using novel strategies, such as the introduction of novel plasmid vectors, adjuvants, alternative delivery routes, and prime-boost regimens. (13) DNA vaccines are promising because they can trigger both humoral and cellular immune responses, thus providing long-term protective immunity. However, naked DNA can hardly enter into cells and is easily degraded by DNases and lysosomes, thus highlighting the need for assessing effective delivery systems.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%