2006
DOI: 10.1139/g06-017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DNA typing and genetic relations among European hazelnut (Corylus avellanaL.) cultivars using microsatellite markers

Abstract: In this work, 78 hazelnut (Corylus avellana L.) cultivars from various germplasm repositories were studied at 16 simple sequence repeat (SSR) loci in order to identify the genotypes and investigate their genetic relations. Polymorphism at SSR loci was evaluated on the basis of number of alleles (mean: 9.4), expected heterozygosity (mean: 0.78), and power of discrimination (mean: 0.91). Several synonyms reported in the literature were confirmed, and new cases of synonymy were identified. The parentage of North … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

16
103
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(119 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
16
103
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, additional cultivars were found to have the same profile of 'Siciliana': 'Nocchione', 'Barrettona' (Latium), 'Locale di Piazza Armerina' (Sicily), 'Iannusa racinante' (Sicily), 'Avellana speciale' (unknown origin), confirming the results obtained by Boccacci et al (2006). The accessions 'Istrska okrogloplodna' (Croatia) and 'Lambertski beli' (Slovenia) presented the same profile of the cultivars 'Payrone' (unknown origin, syn.…”
Section: Dna-typing Of Accessions From European Germplasm Collectionssupporting
confidence: 81%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Furthermore, additional cultivars were found to have the same profile of 'Siciliana': 'Nocchione', 'Barrettona' (Latium), 'Locale di Piazza Armerina' (Sicily), 'Iannusa racinante' (Sicily), 'Avellana speciale' (unknown origin), confirming the results obtained by Boccacci et al (2006). The accessions 'Istrska okrogloplodna' (Croatia) and 'Lambertski beli' (Slovenia) presented the same profile of the cultivars 'Payrone' (unknown origin, syn.…”
Section: Dna-typing Of Accessions From European Germplasm Collectionssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Cultivars originating from controlled crosses and synonyms were excluded, but those that had been found to descend from spontaneous crosses were included. True-to-type identity of the accessions was verified by Boccacci et al (2005Boccacci et al ( , 2006Boccacci et al ( , 2008 and Ghanbari et al (2005) using the following 16 SSR loci: CaT-A114, CaT-B107, CaT-B501, CaT-B502, CaT-B503, CaT-B504, CaT-B505, CaT-B507, CaT-B508, CaT-B509, CaT-B511, CaT-C001 and CaT-C504 , CaC-A102, CaC-B020 and CaC-B028 .…”
Section: Microsatellite Variabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Whilst there have been several studies on C. avellana, the present study is the first to look at natural populations of hazel using high-resolution, codominant nuclear microsatellite markers, in contrast with those which have used low resolution and/or dominant markers (allozymes and amplified fragment length polymorphisms (AFLPs)) or those which have focused on the genetics of cultivated varieties. Two allozyme studies, one of which examined populations from central to northern Europe (Persson et al 2004) and another which used samples mainly not only from Germany but also from Italy and Hungary (Leinemann et al 2013), found similar levels of genetic diversity, measured by both number of alleles (A) and expected heterozygosity (H E ) Although it is not possible to draw meaningful comparisons between levels of diversity observed in the present study with those calculated from allozymes in natural populations, it is possible to contrast these levels with those observed in cultivated varieties and landraces based on microsatellites, which were lower and ranged from H E = 0.71 to H E = 0.78 (Boccacci et al 2006;Gökirmak et al 2009;Boccacci and Botta 2010;Gürcan et al 2010b;Campa et al 2011;Boccacci et al 2013). In contrast, all but one sample analysed here had an H E >0.8 (Table 1).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 39%