1995
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.92.12.5719
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DNA synthesis and topoisomerase inhibitors increase transduction by adeno-associated virus vectors.

Abstract: Viral vectors based on adeno-associated virus (AAV) preferentially transduce cells in S phase of the cell cycle. We recently found that DNA-damaging agents increased the transduction of nondividing cells. However, the optimal concentrations were toxic to cells. Here we show that the transduction of normal human fibroblasts by AAV vectors is increased by prior exposure to DNA synthesis inhibitors, such as aphidicolin or hydroxyurea, and topoisomerase inhibitors, such as etoposide or camptothecin. Transduction e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

8
165
2
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 201 publications
(176 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(15 reference statements)
8
165
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…13,14,19 The scAAV will suffer no such limitation and can be used with marker genes to directly determine whether a cell is permissive for rAAV transduction in all other steps irrespective of DNA synthesis. In light of the drastic treatments which have been proposed to promote rAAV transduction efficiency in vivo (ie gamma radiation, HU, topoisomerase inhibitors) 14,29 it will be prudent to evaluate whether such lengths would be either necessary or effectual using scAAV in preliminary studies. Regardless of the ability of the target cell to make the rAAV complementary strand, it is clear that these reagents provide an alternative AAV delivery system for genes that may require rapid onset.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13,14,19 The scAAV will suffer no such limitation and can be used with marker genes to directly determine whether a cell is permissive for rAAV transduction in all other steps irrespective of DNA synthesis. In light of the drastic treatments which have been proposed to promote rAAV transduction efficiency in vivo (ie gamma radiation, HU, topoisomerase inhibitors) 14,29 it will be prudent to evaluate whether such lengths would be either necessary or effectual using scAAV in preliminary studies. Regardless of the ability of the target cell to make the rAAV complementary strand, it is clear that these reagents provide an alternative AAV delivery system for genes that may require rapid onset.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, others have demonstrated preferential transduction of cells in S-phase by AAV vectors. 47 We cannot, however, exclude the possibility of high-dose cytokines potentiating rAAVmediated transduction of CD34 + cells by other mechanisms such as up-regulation of heparan sulfate or ␣V␤5 integrin which mediate AAV entry into cells. 35,48 Indeed up-regulation of ␣v␤5 integrin on the surface of monocytes by GM-CSF facilitated adenovirus-mediated gene transfer.…”
Section: The Induced and The Uninduced Cells Were Then Transferredmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Extrapolations from these numbers generate transduction efficiencies of approximately 15 infectious irradiation or adenovirus coinfection are not required to particles per positive cell for the NSE rAAV and 45 infectious achieve efficient transduction. [32][33][34][35] particles per positive cell for the PDGF rAAV.…”
Section: Transduction Efficiencymentioning
confidence: 99%