1978
DOI: 10.1080/09553007814550401
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DNA Synthesis and Cell Survival after X-irradiation of Mammalian Cells Treated with Caffeine or Adenine

Abstract: The expression of the transient depression in the rate of DNA synthesis normally observed after exposure of randomly-dividing Chinese hamster V-79 or Chinese hamster CHO cells to ionizing radiation can be postponed or diminished by a post-irradiation treatment with 1.0 to 1.0 mM adenine or 1.5 mM caffeine. Caffeine may exert its effect by creating additional sites for replication in irradiated cells. Cells treated with caffeine or adenine for 2 or 4 hours after exposure to 3000 rad of 300 kVp X-rays exhibit de… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1979
1979
2004
2004

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As expected, in both cell lines radiation exposure inhibits ongoing DNA replication and ca eine reverses this e ect. The overshooting observed at low doses re¯ects the activation by ca eine of additional replication origins and has been previously described (Gri ths et al, 1978;Lehmann, 1972;Painter, 1980;Tatsumi and Strauss, 1979;Tolmach et al, 1977). For an evaluation of the e ect of ca eine Thus, despite the reduced ca eine radiosensitization to killing, cells defective in XRCC2 activate DNA damage checkpoints in S and G2 phases of the cell cycle, and ca eine e ectively disrupts this activation.…”
Section: Caffeine Abrogates Checkpoint Response In Cells Deficient Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As expected, in both cell lines radiation exposure inhibits ongoing DNA replication and ca eine reverses this e ect. The overshooting observed at low doses re¯ects the activation by ca eine of additional replication origins and has been previously described (Gri ths et al, 1978;Lehmann, 1972;Painter, 1980;Tatsumi and Strauss, 1979;Tolmach et al, 1977). For an evaluation of the e ect of ca eine Thus, despite the reduced ca eine radiosensitization to killing, cells defective in XRCC2 activate DNA damage checkpoints in S and G2 phases of the cell cycle, and ca eine e ectively disrupts this activation.…”
Section: Caffeine Abrogates Checkpoint Response In Cells Deficient Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A widely held view is that radiosensitization derives from the ability of ca eine to disrupt multiple DNA damage-responsive cell cycle checkpoints. Indeed ca eine has been shown to reduce or eliminate p53 activation and G1-arrest (Kastan et al, 1991;Powell et al, 1995;Valenzuela et al, 2000), S phase delay (Gri ths et al, 1978;Murnane et al, 1980;Painter, 1980;Tolmach et al, 1977;Walters et al, 1974) and G2/M arrest (Jung and Stre er, 1992;Kimler et al, 1982;Lau and Pardee, 1982;Lucke-Huhle, 1982;Rowley, 1992;Tomasovic and Dewey, 1978) in cells exposed to ionizing radiation. Because checkpoints provide extra time that can be used for repair (Hartwell and Kastan, 1994;Hartwell and Weinert, 1989), abrogation by ca eine is expected to enhance the lethal and mutagenic e ects of DNA damaging agents.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, caffeine has been shown to reduce or eliminate in irradiated cells p53 activation and G1 arrest (Kastan et al, 1991;Powell et al, 1995;Valenzuela et al, 2000), S-phase delay (Walters et al, 1974;Tolmach et al, 1977;Griffiths et al, 1978;Murnane et al, 1980;Painter, 1980) and G2/M arrest (Tomasovic and Dewey, 1978;Kimler et al, 1982;Lau and Pardee, 1982;Lu¨cke-Huhle et al, 1983;Jung and Streffer, 1992;Rowley, 1992), and the latter effect has been associated with increased apoptosis (Palayoor et al, 1995;Bernhard et al, 1996;Yao et al, 1996;Shinomiya et al, 1997). Numerous investigations, however, have failed to demonstrate a direct correlation between checkpoint abrogation and caffeine radiosensitization (Walters et al, 1974;Musk and Steel, 1990;Musk, 1991;Harvey and Savage, 1994;Ribeiro et al, 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%