1973
DOI: 10.1016/0005-2787(73)90004-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DNA stiffening and elongation caused by the binding of ethidium bromide

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

1977
1977
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The investigations were carried out under simulated physiological pH conditions (8.0) at 25 ± 0.1°C. The effects of complexes 1 – 6 on the viscosity of salmon testes DNA were investigated alongside a known intercalating agent, ethidium bromide (EB) . The relative viscosity of DNA with increasing concentrations of the silver(I) complexes and EB is shown in Figure .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The investigations were carried out under simulated physiological pH conditions (8.0) at 25 ± 0.1°C. The effects of complexes 1 – 6 on the viscosity of salmon testes DNA were investigated alongside a known intercalating agent, ethidium bromide (EB) . The relative viscosity of DNA with increasing concentrations of the silver(I) complexes and EB is shown in Figure .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With this drug the changes in contour length for both polynucleotides were much smaller, yielding least-squares lines having slopes well below the predicted value of 2 or the experimental value of 1.79 reported for calf thymus DNA [17]. Fig.4.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…The viscometric technique is well established as a method for investigating the extension of the DNA helix associated with intercalation [15][16][17][18]. Under conditions where the DNA molecules behave as stiff rods:…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The straight line plotted represents a least-squares fit to all the data points; its slope is 3.74, which is typical of the values reported for bifunctional intercalators (Waring, 1979). It falls slightly below the theoretical line for idealized bifunctional intercalation, which predicts the relationship L/Lo = 1 + 4r, but its gradient is well over twice the value seen for ethidium (Reinert, 1973). However, the line does not pass through 1.00 and there is an apparent initial decrease in L/Lo.…”
Section: Viscometrymentioning
confidence: 84%