1975
DOI: 10.1007/bf00284817
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DNA sequence organization in the genomes of five marine invertebrates

Abstract: The arrangement of repetitive and non-repetitive sequence was studied in the genomic DNA of the oyster (Crassostrea virginica), the surf clam (Spisula solidissima), the horseshoe crab (Limulus polyphemus), a nemertean worm (Cerebratulus lacteus) and a jelly-fish (Aurelia aurita). Except for the jellyfish these animals belong to the protostomial branch of animal evolution, for which little information regarding DNA sequence organization has previously been available. The reassociation kinetics of short (250-300… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

4
29
1
1

Year Published

1977
1977
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
4
29
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The genome sequence depth for all three species is around sixfold, recovering~1.5 Gbp per species. This is lower than the previously estimated genome sizes of these species of~2.8 Gbp (Goldberg et al, 1975), which together with CEGMA data suggest the assembled genome data sets are biased towards coding sequence to the exclusion of longer repeat sequences, or perhaps that previous calculations were overestimates. A L. polyphemus genome has been noted online (Nossa et al, 2014), but the data presented here represents a large increase in publically available sequence data for the Xiphosura clade, particularly by including Southeast Asian species.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 67%
“…The genome sequence depth for all three species is around sixfold, recovering~1.5 Gbp per species. This is lower than the previously estimated genome sizes of these species of~2.8 Gbp (Goldberg et al, 1975), which together with CEGMA data suggest the assembled genome data sets are biased towards coding sequence to the exclusion of longer repeat sequences, or perhaps that previous calculations were overestimates. A L. polyphemus genome has been noted online (Nossa et al, 2014), but the data presented here represents a large increase in publically available sequence data for the Xiphosura clade, particularly by including Southeast Asian species.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 67%
“…DNA was sheared to different singlestrand sizes in the Virtis 60 homogenizer (15,16). The modal single-strand fragment lengths were ascertained by analytical alkaline band sedimentation velocity in the model E ultracentrifuge (17) or by alkaline sucrose density centrifugation (2).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Size distribution of S1 nuclease-resistant repetitive duplexes. DNA fragments (7500 Nt) were reassociated to a Cot of 0.3 (a Cot at which over 75% of Achlya repetitive sequences form duplex structures but only 3% of single copy sequences can react) at 600 in 0.18 M NaCl/6 mM 1,4-piperazinediethanesulfonic acid (Pipes), pH 6.7, directly treated with S1 nuclease according to the mild conditions of Britten et al (19), and collected by HAP chromatography (13,16). Approximately 15% of the DNA was resistant to S1 nuclease.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Mathematical analysis of a Cot curve permits estimation of genome size, the proportion of the genome contained in the single-copy and repetitive DNA components, and the kinetic complexity of each component. Interspecific comparison of Cot data has provided considerable insight into the structure and evolution of eukaryotic genomes (e.g., Britten and Kohne 1968;Davidson et al 1975;Goldberg et al 1975;Galau et al 1976;Hake and Walbot 1980;Geever et al 1989).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%