1994
DOI: 10.1006/jmbi.1994.1044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DNA Sequence Organization in Chromatosomes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
34
1

Year Published

1994
1994
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
34
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These provide a data-intensive framework to evaluate models for sequence-based nucleosome positioning. Many previous analyses of smaller nucleosome core data sets have reported a periodicity of k-mer usage within the DNA of the core of the nucleosome (e.g., Satchwell et al 1986;Muyldermans and Travers 1994;Ioshikhes et al 1996;Johnson et al 2006;Albert et al 2007), which is thought to be important in the positioning of nucleosomes due to the ability of certain regularly spaced dinucleotides to more easily facilitate the extreme curvature of the double-stranded DNA around the histone octamer (Luger et al 1997). Consistent with these previous studies, a simple dinucleotide analysis of our core sequence data set reveals an oscillating ∼10-base periodicity of AA/TT with a counter phased ∼10-base periodicity for GC.…”
Section: Global Sequence Characteristics Of Nucleosome Core Segmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These provide a data-intensive framework to evaluate models for sequence-based nucleosome positioning. Many previous analyses of smaller nucleosome core data sets have reported a periodicity of k-mer usage within the DNA of the core of the nucleosome (e.g., Satchwell et al 1986;Muyldermans and Travers 1994;Ioshikhes et al 1996;Johnson et al 2006;Albert et al 2007), which is thought to be important in the positioning of nucleosomes due to the ability of certain regularly spaced dinucleotides to more easily facilitate the extreme curvature of the double-stranded DNA around the histone octamer (Luger et al 1997). Consistent with these previous studies, a simple dinucleotide analysis of our core sequence data set reveals an oscillating ∼10-base periodicity of AA/TT with a counter phased ∼10-base periodicity for GC.…”
Section: Global Sequence Characteristics Of Nucleosome Core Segmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because micrococcal nuclease strongly prefers to cut after AT base pairs (70), the protection seen in these digestion experiments could be the result of sequence preferences of micrococcal nuclease rather than protection by linker histone. Indeed, over 95% of bulk chromatosomal sequences that were cloned and sequenced had AT base pairs at their ends (79). Protection experiments on bulk chromatin are less susceptible to potential problems arising from the sequence preferences of the nuclease.…”
Section: The Chromatosomementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sequence preference of H1/H5 on the 5S nucleosome is strong enough to make it select one of the two potential binding sites almost exclusively, and this strong preference may also preclude its binding at a possibly more usual site. Interestingly, in a study of bulk chromatosomal sequences, an AGGA sequence was observed near one of the termini of chromatosomal DNA but not the other (79), raising the possibility that this sequence may be involved in binding the globular domain of H1/H5. This sequence does not occur at the same place on the 5S nucleosome.…”
Section: The Chromatosomementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The length of DNA in the core is conserved, while the "linker" DNA between nucleosomes can vary between species, chromatin regions, and cells. In many situations, an additional set of histones (H1 or H5) associate with linker DNA immediately flanking the core (Muyldermans and Travers 1994;Buttinelli et al 1999).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While these studies have greatly increased our fundamental understanding of many of the translational and rotational constraints conferred by DNA sequences, they all suffer from the simplicity of the assay, in particular the reconstitution of nucleosomes away from their native nuclear context. Complementary to these are in situ experiments in which chromatin is isolated from cells and then nucleosome positioning and structure are analyzed (Satchwell et al 1986;Muyldermans and Travers 1994;Travers and Muyldermans 1996). Accurate retention and representation of nucleosome positioning has been a long-standing issue in the field, and numerous debates have addressed the questions of whether different isolation and analysis protocols might themselves influence the distributions of observed nucleosome positions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%