1994
DOI: 10.1094/mpmi-7-0564
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DNA Sequence of the Common Nodulation Genes ofBradyrhizobium elkanii andTheir Phylogenetic Relationship to Those of Other Nodulating Bacteria

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
43
2
3

Year Published

1996
1996
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
5
43
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The nod genes of the soybean symbionts S. fredii and B. japonicum have been reported as being of the same lineage (Dobert et al, 1994), but the result was not supported by bootstrap analysis, as confirmed by more recent phylogenetic surveys inferred from nodA (Haukka et al, 1998) and nodC (Pre! vost et al, 2000) genes.…”
Section: Relationship Of Phylogeny Of Sym Genes To Host Specificitymentioning
confidence: 95%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The nod genes of the soybean symbionts S. fredii and B. japonicum have been reported as being of the same lineage (Dobert et al, 1994), but the result was not supported by bootstrap analysis, as confirmed by more recent phylogenetic surveys inferred from nodA (Haukka et al, 1998) and nodC (Pre! vost et al, 2000) genes.…”
Section: Relationship Of Phylogeny Of Sym Genes To Host Specificitymentioning
confidence: 95%
“…On the other hand, lateral gene transfer of the Sym genes appears to be the most plausible hypothesis to explain cases of phylogenetic incongruence between Sym and housekeeping genes (Martinez-Romero & CaballeroMellado, 1996 ;Young & Haukka, 1996). Indeed, phylogenetic trees based on sequences of nod genes are generally not congruent with those based on 16S rDNA sequences, but the nod trees show some correlation with host plant range (Dobert et al, 1994 ;Lindstro$ m et al, 1995 ;Ueda et al, 1995 ;Haukka et al, 1998 ;Wernegreen & Riley, 1999). By contrast, the phylogeny of nifH genes, which encode the dinitrogenase reductase enzyme, has been reported as closely following that of 16S rRNA genes (Hennecke et al, 1985 ;Young, 1992 ;Dobert et al, 1994), despite some exceptions (Eardly et al, 1992).…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Several authors have constructed phylogenies based on nod gene sequences and have concluded that they are not congruent with those based on SSU rRNA (Gyorgypal, Kiss & Kondorosi, 1991;Dobert, Breil & Triplett, 1994;Lindstrom et al, 1995 a), For example, the nodABC and D genes of S, fredii and 5, meliloti are not closely related; they are closer to those of B. faponicum on the one hand and to R. leguminosarum biovars trifolii and viciae on the other. This makes sense in terms of their respective host plant ranges, and is more likely to reflect lateral transfer than convergent evolution since these genes, the so-called 'common nod genes' are not major determinants of host range.…”
Section: Symbiosismentioning
confidence: 99%