2017
DOI: 10.1101/gr.218602.116
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DNA replication timing during development anticipates transcriptional programs and parallels enhancer activation

Abstract: In dividing cells, DNA replication occurs in a precise order, but many questions remain regarding the mechanisms of replication timing establishment and regulation. We now have generated genome-wide, high-resolution replication timing maps throughout zebrafish development. Unexpectedly, in the rapid cell cycles preceding the midblastula transition, a defined timing program was present that predicted the initial wave of zygotic transcription. Replication timing was thereafter progressively and continuously remo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
79
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
3
79
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Differences in replication timing can have significant consequences, as late replication is associated with higher frequencies of mutation and genome rearrangement (Chen et al, 2010;Koren et al, 2012;Lang & Murray, 2011;Stamatoyannopoulos et al, 2009;Weber, Pink, & Hurst, 2012;Yehuda et al, 2018). The importance of replication timing is underscored by the observation that it is sometimes modulated according to the utility of the region being replicated: For example, some chromosomal regions containing developmentally regulated genes replicate early only during those developmental phases during which they are activated (Hiratani et al, 2010;Rivera-Mulia et al, 2015;Siefert, Georgescu, Wren, Koren, & Sansam, 2017). An even more striking example is the X chromosome in female mammals, where the active X chromosome (Xa) replicates early while the inactive X (Xi) replicates late (Gilbert, Muldal, Lajtha, & Rowley, 1962;Hansen, Canfield, Fjeld, & Gartler, 1996;Heard & Disteche, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Differences in replication timing can have significant consequences, as late replication is associated with higher frequencies of mutation and genome rearrangement (Chen et al, 2010;Koren et al, 2012;Lang & Murray, 2011;Stamatoyannopoulos et al, 2009;Weber, Pink, & Hurst, 2012;Yehuda et al, 2018). The importance of replication timing is underscored by the observation that it is sometimes modulated according to the utility of the region being replicated: For example, some chromosomal regions containing developmentally regulated genes replicate early only during those developmental phases during which they are activated (Hiratani et al, 2010;Rivera-Mulia et al, 2015;Siefert, Georgescu, Wren, Koren, & Sansam, 2017). An even more striking example is the X chromosome in female mammals, where the active X chromosome (Xa) replicates early while the inactive X (Xi) replicates late (Gilbert, Muldal, Lajtha, & Rowley, 1962;Hansen, Canfield, Fjeld, & Gartler, 1996;Heard & Disteche, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is not late replicating until the end of gastrulation or bud stage (10 hpf) (Siefert et al, 2017). Previous work in zebrafish has found ZnF proteins on chromosome 4 to undergo robust expression from the initiation of zygotic transcription until mid-gastrula stage (White et al, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We wanted to know if START-R suite can run the correct analyses with this type of data and also with other organisms than mouse and human. We performed exactly the same pipeline used for early-late Repli-seq data described above for Drosophila, zebrafish and human S/G1 data (Armstrong et al, 2018;Siefert et al, 2017;Massey et al, 2019), in order to be sure that the integration into the START-R pipeline was correct. Then and as expected,…”
Section: Validation Of Start-r With Early-late Repli-seq Data From Mousementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different laboratories analyze variations of DNA copy number between G1 and S phase cells (S/G1 ratio) to study the replication timing program with Repli-seq. We used data obtained from different organisms such as Drosophila, zebrafish and human (Armstrong et al, 2018;Siefert et al, 2017;Massey et al, 2019), to validate the START-R suite (GEO accession numbers: GSM3154888 and GSM3154890 for HWT Drosophila melanogaster female larvae wing disc cells in S and G1 phase, respectively; GSM2282090 for 28hpf Danio rerio embryos; SRX3413939-40 for HEK293T human cells in S and G1 phase, respectively). As previously, reads from G1 and S fractions are mapped with Bowtie2, then PCR duplicates are removed by RmDUP tool, and Bamcoverage is used to obtain the coverage with RPKM.…”
Section: Validation Of Start-r Suite Using S/g1 Data From Multiple Spmentioning
confidence: 99%