1974
DOI: 10.1007/bf01926308
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DNA renaturation kinetics in some paedogenetic urodeles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
1

Year Published

1976
1976
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
6
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Many different ideas have been proposed to explain genome size variation among organisms. The simplest explanation is a change in the ratio of DNA that codes for proteins versus non-protein coding DNA [ 29 ]. Although variation in gene number maybe important, this distinction is too simple because non-protein coding DNA has been shown in recent years to encode a diversity of functional elements.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many different ideas have been proposed to explain genome size variation among organisms. The simplest explanation is a change in the ratio of DNA that codes for proteins versus non-protein coding DNA [ 29 ]. Although variation in gene number maybe important, this distinction is too simple because non-protein coding DNA has been shown in recent years to encode a diversity of functional elements.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The axolotl genome consists of 14 chromosome pairs (2N = 28) 14 and estimates of its physical size range from 21–48 gigabases 15 16 17 . Early DNA reannealing studies suggested that repetitive elements constitute at least 70% of the A. tigrinum genome, a close relative of the axolotl; similarly large repetitive fractions are predicted for other salamander genomes 18 19 20 21 22 . Indeed, large genome size is a common feature of all extant salamanders, suggesting a shared period of genome expansion prior to the basal salamander divergence during the early Jurassic, ~180 million years ago 23 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The remainder of the DNA reassociates slowly with a C0tl/2 value of 1.2 • 104. Triturus c. carni]ex has a DNA content of between 21 pg (Sexsmith, 1968;Morescalchi and Serra, 1974) and 29 pg (quoted by Callan, 1972) per haploid genome, which is equivalent to 2-3 • 101~ nucleotide pairs and a theoretical C0tl/~ for unique sequences, according to Britten and Kohne (1968), in excess of 3.4 • 10 ~. Consequently the experimental C0tl/2 value of 1.2 • 104 for slowly reassociating sequences is lower than the expected value.…”
Section: Reassociation and Molecular Hybridization (A) Reassociation mentioning
confidence: 99%