Abstract:Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), due to its genomic heterogeneity and lack of effective treatment, despite decades of intensive research, will become the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths by 2030. Step-wise acquisition of mutations, due to genomic instability, is considered to drive the development of PDAC; the KRAS mutation occurs in 95 to 100% of human PDAC, and is already detectable in early premalignant lesions designated as pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PanIN). This mutation is… Show more
“…Accordingly, examinations of lung adenocarcinoma datasets from TCGA revealed an association between high Pol θ expression and an increased number of somatic mutations in tumors 50 . Interestingly, the abundance of Pol θ and other key TMEJ proteins (PARP1, Lig3, and Mre11) increases following the expression of oncogenic KRAS (KRAS G12D ) via a post‐transcriptional mechanism and, as a result, mutagenic TMEJ is encouraged 51 . Disrupting TMEJ by Pol θ deletion in mice expressing oncogenic KRAS delays the development of tumors, suggesting this pathway is a key player in KRAS‐induced tumorigenesis.…”
Section: Misregulation Of Error‐prone Polymerase In Cancermentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 50 Interestingly, the abundance of Pol θ and other key TMEJ proteins (PARP1, Lig3, and Mre11) increases following the expression of oncogenic KRAS (KRAS G12D ) via a post‐transcriptional mechanism and, as a result, mutagenic TMEJ is encouraged. 51 Disrupting TMEJ by Pol θ deletion in mice expressing oncogenic KRAS delays the development of tumors, suggesting this pathway is a key player in KRAS‐induced tumorigenesis. This is supported by data from TCGA which reveals that low Pol θ expression can increase survival in pancreatic adenocarcinoma patients with oncogenic KRAS mutations.…”
Section: Misregulation Of Error‐prone Polymerase In Cancermentioning
Human cells possess many different polymerase enzymes, which collaborate in conducting DNA replication and genome maintenance to ensure faithful duplication of genetic material. Each polymerase performs a specialized role, together providing a balance of accuracy and flexibility to the replication process. Perturbed replication increases the requirement for flexibility to ensure duplication of the entire genome. Flexibility is provided via the use of error‐prone polymerases, which maintain the progression of challenged DNA replication at the expense of mutagenesis, an enabling characteristic of cancer. This review describes our recent understanding of mechanisms that alter the usage of polymerases during tumorigenesis and examines the implications of this for cell survival and tumor progression. Although expression levels of polymerases are often misregulated in cancers, this does not necessarily alter polymerase usage since an additional regulatory step may govern the use of these enzymes. We therefore also examine how the regulatory mechanisms of DNA polymerases, such as Rad18‐mediated PCNA ubiquitylation, may impact the functionalization of error‐prone polymerases to tolerate oncogene‐induced replication stress. Crucially, it is becoming increasingly evident that cancer cells utilize error‐prone polymerases to sustain ongoing replication in response to oncogenic mutations which inactivate key DNA replication and repair pathways, such as BRCA deficiency. This accelerates mutagenesis and confers chemoresistance, but also presents a dependency that can potentially be exploited by therapeutics.
“…Accordingly, examinations of lung adenocarcinoma datasets from TCGA revealed an association between high Pol θ expression and an increased number of somatic mutations in tumors 50 . Interestingly, the abundance of Pol θ and other key TMEJ proteins (PARP1, Lig3, and Mre11) increases following the expression of oncogenic KRAS (KRAS G12D ) via a post‐transcriptional mechanism and, as a result, mutagenic TMEJ is encouraged 51 . Disrupting TMEJ by Pol θ deletion in mice expressing oncogenic KRAS delays the development of tumors, suggesting this pathway is a key player in KRAS‐induced tumorigenesis.…”
Section: Misregulation Of Error‐prone Polymerase In Cancermentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 50 Interestingly, the abundance of Pol θ and other key TMEJ proteins (PARP1, Lig3, and Mre11) increases following the expression of oncogenic KRAS (KRAS G12D ) via a post‐transcriptional mechanism and, as a result, mutagenic TMEJ is encouraged. 51 Disrupting TMEJ by Pol θ deletion in mice expressing oncogenic KRAS delays the development of tumors, suggesting this pathway is a key player in KRAS‐induced tumorigenesis. This is supported by data from TCGA which reveals that low Pol θ expression can increase survival in pancreatic adenocarcinoma patients with oncogenic KRAS mutations.…”
Section: Misregulation Of Error‐prone Polymerase In Cancermentioning
Human cells possess many different polymerase enzymes, which collaborate in conducting DNA replication and genome maintenance to ensure faithful duplication of genetic material. Each polymerase performs a specialized role, together providing a balance of accuracy and flexibility to the replication process. Perturbed replication increases the requirement for flexibility to ensure duplication of the entire genome. Flexibility is provided via the use of error‐prone polymerases, which maintain the progression of challenged DNA replication at the expense of mutagenesis, an enabling characteristic of cancer. This review describes our recent understanding of mechanisms that alter the usage of polymerases during tumorigenesis and examines the implications of this for cell survival and tumor progression. Although expression levels of polymerases are often misregulated in cancers, this does not necessarily alter polymerase usage since an additional regulatory step may govern the use of these enzymes. We therefore also examine how the regulatory mechanisms of DNA polymerases, such as Rad18‐mediated PCNA ubiquitylation, may impact the functionalization of error‐prone polymerases to tolerate oncogene‐induced replication stress. Crucially, it is becoming increasingly evident that cancer cells utilize error‐prone polymerases to sustain ongoing replication in response to oncogenic mutations which inactivate key DNA replication and repair pathways, such as BRCA deficiency. This accelerates mutagenesis and confers chemoresistance, but also presents a dependency that can potentially be exploited by therapeutics.
“…Unique biochemical properties and functions of Pol θ suggest that it is a prospective target for cancer treatment. To date, many studies have supported the association of Pol θ expression/activity changes with disease development and progression, increased resistance to chemotherapeutic agents and poor prognosis in patients with breast, liver, prostate, esophagus, colon, lungs, stomach and pancreas cancer [ 94 , 95 , 96 , 97 , 98 , 99 , 100 , 101 , 102 ].…”
Section: How Attractive Is Pol θ As a Target In Cancer Therapy?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Oncogenic KRAS mutations, driving malignant transformation of pancreatic cells, markedly upregulate the expression of TMEJ factors Mre11, Lig3, and Pol θ. TMEJ activation in murine and human cells with KRAS mutations resulted in the promotion of pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia. Since TMEJ is the most preferred DNA repair pathway in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma cells, inhibition of Pol θ led to a slowing of disease progression and improved survival of animal models [ 96 ].…”
Section: How Attractive Is Pol θ As a Target In Cancer Therapy?mentioning
DNA polymerase θ belongs to the A family of DNA polymerases and plays a key role in DNA repair and damage tolerance, including double-strand break repair and DNA translesion synthesis. Pol θ is often overexpressed in cancer cells and promotes their resistance to chemotherapeutic agents. In this review, we discuss unique biochemical properties and structural features of Pol θ, its multiple roles in protection of genome stability and the potential of Pol θ as a target for cancer treatment.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.