Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
1990
DOI: 10.1042/bj2650309
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DNA methylation. The effect of minor bases on DNA-protein interactions

Abstract: DNA methylation is found almost ubiquitously in nature and the methyltransferases show evidence of a common evolutionary origin. It will be a fascinating study in protein evolution to follow the ways in which the structures of the various enzymes have developed. Although methylation may have a direct effect on DNA structure the evidence for the importance of this in vivo is accumulating only slowly. In contrast, there is now abundant evidence that methylation of DNA affects DNA-protein interactions and so may … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

3
94
0
6

Year Published

1994
1994
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 182 publications
(103 citation statements)
references
References 134 publications
3
94
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…In such cases, the lack of its expression in the extrahepatic tissues could be due to situations known to stably repress the transcription of many tissue-specific genes, such as DNA methylation or genome organization (i.e. compaction of the chromatin) (46,47). By analyzing a series of 5Ј-end deletions, two major regulatory regions have been identified, a promoter proximal region (Ϫ193 bp relative to the transcription start site) and a far upstream area extending nucleotides Ϫ1251 to Ϫ958.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In such cases, the lack of its expression in the extrahepatic tissues could be due to situations known to stably repress the transcription of many tissue-specific genes, such as DNA methylation or genome organization (i.e. compaction of the chromatin) (46,47). By analyzing a series of 5Ј-end deletions, two major regulatory regions have been identified, a promoter proximal region (Ϫ193 bp relative to the transcription start site) and a far upstream area extending nucleotides Ϫ1251 to Ϫ958.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In land plants, cytosine methylation at CpHpG sites (where H equals A, T, or C) is faithfully inherited by daughter cells in addition to the symmetric CpG sites (Tariq and Paszkowski 2004;Chan et al 2005). In A. thaliana, .30% of total C's in the genome are methylated (Adams 1990), while in the case of C. reinhardtii (Hattman et al 1978) and its closely related multicellular relative, Volvox carteri (Babinger et al 2001), the percentages of cytosine methylation are only 0.7 and 1.1%, respectively. In V. carteri, limited CpG methylation undoubtedly contributes to gene silencing 1 of transgenes and endogenous transposons (Babinger et al 2001(Babinger et al , 2007.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The DMI might play an analogous role in mammalian cells where nuclear structure is required for site-specific initiation of DNA replication (20,21). In fact, site specificity is established during the middle of G 1 phase in each cell cycle (22), about the time when DNA methyltransferase activity appears and then increases during S phase (23)(24)(25). Therefore, it was imperative to confirm the existence of a DMI at a well characterized mammalian replication origin and to determine whether or not a DMI appears at a specific time during the cell division cycle.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%