2020
DOI: 10.1101/2020.07.22.215939
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DNA methylation signatures of aggression and closely related constructs: A meta-analysis of epigenome-wide studies across the lifespan

Abstract: DNA methylation profiles of aggressive behavior may capture lifetime cumulative effects of genetic, stochastic, and environmental influences associated with aggression. Here, we report the first large meta-analysis of epigenome-wide association studies (EWAS) of aggressive behavior (N=15,324 participants). In peripheral blood samples of 14,434 participants from 18 cohorts with mean ages ranging from 7 to 68 years, 13 methylation sites were significantly associated with aggression (alpha=1.2×10−7; Bonferroni co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
(37 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The CpGs in the single- or multi-omics models did not overlap with the top differentially methylated CpGs for physical aggression as observed in buccal-cells (Cecil et al 2018b), and were not significantly associated with aggression in a recent blood-based EWAS meta-analysis (van Dongen et al 2021). That our models selected no CpGs overlapping with these studies was unsurprising, since it was previously shown that the top CpGs from these studies were not associated with aggressive behavior in the buccal DNA methylation data in the NTR and LUMC-Curium cohorts (van Dongen et al 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The CpGs in the single- or multi-omics models did not overlap with the top differentially methylated CpGs for physical aggression as observed in buccal-cells (Cecil et al 2018b), and were not significantly associated with aggression in a recent blood-based EWAS meta-analysis (van Dongen et al 2021). That our models selected no CpGs overlapping with these studies was unsurprising, since it was previously shown that the top CpGs from these studies were not associated with aggressive behavior in the buccal DNA methylation data in the NTR and LUMC-Curium cohorts (van Dongen et al 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CpGs in the single- or multi-omics models did not overlap with the top differentially methylated CpGs for physical aggression as observed in buccal-cells (Cecil et al 2018b), and were not significantly associated with aggression in a recent blood-based EWAS meta-analysis (van Dongen et al 2021). That our models selected no CpGs overlapping with these studies was unsurprising, since it was previously shown that the top CpGs from these studies were not associated with aggressive behavior in the buccal DNA methylation data in the NTR and LUMC-Curium cohorts (van Dongen et al 2021). Trait enrichment of the CpGs selected by the single- and multi-omics models reported enrichment of known aggression risk factors, such as socioeconomic status (Miller and Tolan 2019; Bellair et al 2019; Hendriks et al 2020), childhood malnutrition (Liu 2004; Vaughn et al 2016), and pre-and perinatal risk factors (Van Adrichem et al 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Nearly all these epigenome-wide association studies (EWAS) used commercial arrays manufactured by Illumina (predominantly the HM450 and subsequently the scaled-up EPIC850 array) to assess methylation at CpG dinucleotides (a highly stable epigenetic mark) in peripheral blood DNA (6, 7). EWAS have uncovered associations between blood DNA methylation and neurological outcomes including Alzheimer’s disease (8), neurodegenerative disorders (9), educational attainment (10), and psychiatric diseases (11). The HM450 and EPIC arrays were instrumental in discoveries in epigenetic aging (1214), smoking-induced DNA methylation alterations (15), and understanding how maternal smoking (16) and alcohol consumption (17) affect DNA methylation in newborns.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%