2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.ab.2006.05.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DNA methylation mapping by tag-modified bisulfite genomic sequencing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
37
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
2
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The GSTP1 promoter has been shown to be hypermethylated in a variety of cancers, so one possible additional explanation for differences in mRNA expression could be that genetic polymorphisms result in variation in baseline promoter methylation status and, thus, mRNA expression. However, work by Han and colleagues indicates that, in the absence of disease, GSTP1 promoter methylation is conserved across tissue types and among individual subjects (49). Therefore, other variables, such as differences in transacting factors, posttranscriptional modification, and altered mRNA stability or transcription factor binding due to SNPs outside of the resequenced region, may be responsible for the remaining interindividual variation in mRNA expression.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The GSTP1 promoter has been shown to be hypermethylated in a variety of cancers, so one possible additional explanation for differences in mRNA expression could be that genetic polymorphisms result in variation in baseline promoter methylation status and, thus, mRNA expression. However, work by Han and colleagues indicates that, in the absence of disease, GSTP1 promoter methylation is conserved across tissue types and among individual subjects (49). Therefore, other variables, such as differences in transacting factors, posttranscriptional modification, and altered mRNA stability or transcription factor binding due to SNPs outside of the resequenced region, may be responsible for the remaining interindividual variation in mRNA expression.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This allows one to look at 20-30 CpGs within an amplicon. Addition of M13 sequence and a G or C rich tag containing at least 50% cytosines (forward primer) or guanines (reverse primer) to the nested PCR primers for direct sequencing improved the bisulfite sequence quality, 26,38 by increasing the binding specificity during the Sanger sequencing reaction.…”
Section: ©2 0 1 1 L a N D E S B I O S C I E N C E D O N O T D I S Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequently, gene-specific single PCRs with nested primers were used to amplify single DNA molecules. The sequencing performance of the CG-poor DNA was enhanced by tagging the inner primers with a stuffer sequence (Han et al 2006) and further improved by additionally tagging the stuffer with an M13-tag. All primers used in multiplex and gene-specific PCR are summarized in Table 8.…”
Section: Repeat Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%