2007
DOI: 10.1089/clo.2006.0050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DNA Methylation Errors in Cloned Mice Disappear with Advancement of Aging

Abstract: Cloned animals have various health problems. Aberrant DNA methylation is a possible cause of the problems. Restriction landmark genomic scanning (RLGS) that enabled us to analyze more than 1,000 CpG islands simultaneously demonstrated that all cloned newborns had aberrant DNA methylation. To study whether this aberration persists throughout the life of cloned individuals, we examined genome-wide DNA methylation status of newborn (19.5 dpc, n=2), adult (8-11 months old, n=3), and aged (23-27 months old, n=4) cl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

2
13
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
2
13
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In the future, it will be interesting to compare the success rate of different cloning protocols with respect to healthy animals and their DNA methylation levels and to evaluate the possibility of a breedspecific susceptibility to technical constraints by testing the same conditions in different breeds. Moreover, our data do not confirm a normalization of DNA methylation differences between clones and nonclones with advancement of age, as suggested by a study with a limited number of SCNT cloned mice (Senda et al, 2007). Instead, our data support the alternative hypothesis discussed by Senda et al (2007) that only cloned animals with a more appropriate methylation status can survive to adulthood.…”
contrasting
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the future, it will be interesting to compare the success rate of different cloning protocols with respect to healthy animals and their DNA methylation levels and to evaluate the possibility of a breedspecific susceptibility to technical constraints by testing the same conditions in different breeds. Moreover, our data do not confirm a normalization of DNA methylation differences between clones and nonclones with advancement of age, as suggested by a study with a limited number of SCNT cloned mice (Senda et al, 2007). Instead, our data support the alternative hypothesis discussed by Senda et al (2007) that only cloned animals with a more appropriate methylation status can survive to adulthood.…”
contrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, our data do not confirm a normalization of DNA methylation differences between clones and nonclones with advancement of age, as suggested by a study with a limited number of SCNT cloned mice (Senda et al, 2007). Instead, our data support the alternative hypothesis discussed by Senda et al (2007) that only cloned animals with a more appropriate methylation status can survive to adulthood. This assumption is further supported by data from gene-specific analyses that revealed more severely altered epigenetic marks in clones that died soon after birth than in animals that died as juveniles (Lin et al, 2008).…”
contrasting
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Because such abnormalities of clones are not transmitted to their progenies [7][8][9][10][11][12], most of the developmental problems of clones are believed to be the results of epigenetic defects [13]. In fact, several studies have revealed abnormal epigenetic modifications such as DNA methylation and histone modifications in SCNT embryos [14][15][16][17].A wide variety of histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACi) of both natural and synthetic origin has been reported [18]. Trichostatin A (TSA), which is a natural product isolated from Streptomyces hygroscopicus [19], is one of the most frequently used drugs for various studies as a selective HDACi.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even if clones that develop into adults have been assumed to possess a normalized epigenome that corresponds to their normal phenotype (Lanza et al, 2001;Senda et al, 2007), it remains generally considered that those animals are survivors of the poorly efficient process of full reprogramming to totipotency (Jouneau and Renard, 2003; see Fig. 1).…”
Section: Reprogramming To Pluripotency With An Ovocyte Cytoplasm By Smentioning
confidence: 99%