2017
DOI: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00867.2016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DNA methylation assessment from human slow- and fast-twitch skeletal muscle fibers

Abstract: A new application of the reduced representation bisulfite sequencing method was developed using low-DNA input to investigate the epigenetic profile of human slow- and fast-twitch skeletal muscle fibers. Successful library construction was completed with as little as 15 ng of DNA, and high-quality sequencing data were obtained with 32 ng of DNA. Analysis identified 143,160 differentially methylated CpG sites across 14,046 genes. In both fiber types, selected genes predominantly expressed in slow or fast fibers … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
36
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 91 publications
2
36
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Given that one of the major drivers of DNA methylation pattern is cell type, it could be that the altered methylation pattern in the superaged muscle reflects a change in the composition of muscle fiber types with age. We only know that the human type 1 slow‐twitch and type 2a fast‐twitch muscle fibers had similar levels and distributions of methylated CpGs at promoters and CGIs (Begue, Raue, Jemiolo, & Trappe, ). However, there is no information about whether the different muscle fibers undergo unique methylation changes in their own pattern with age.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given that one of the major drivers of DNA methylation pattern is cell type, it could be that the altered methylation pattern in the superaged muscle reflects a change in the composition of muscle fiber types with age. We only know that the human type 1 slow‐twitch and type 2a fast‐twitch muscle fibers had similar levels and distributions of methylated CpGs at promoters and CGIs (Begue, Raue, Jemiolo, & Trappe, ). However, there is no information about whether the different muscle fibers undergo unique methylation changes in their own pattern with age.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eighteen fiber-type specific samples were generated as previously described 20 . Briefly, all samples were prepared according to the following steps: (1) manual muscle fiber isolation, (2) muscle fiber clipping to allow for fiber-type identification via SDS-PAGE 6 , (3) muscle fiber pooling of alike fiber-types, (4) RNA extraction (TRI Reagent, Molecular Research Center, Cincinnati, OH) and RNA quantification (Quant-iT RNA assay kit, Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While this study was able to determine several muscle type specific genes, it is unclear whether these genes are truly fiber type specific or simply differ between muscle locations. Previous transcriptome studies of manually dissected fiber-types analyzed mouse skeletal muscle 18,19 or did not focus on human baseline transcriptome differences 8,20 . Isolated human skeletal muscle mononuclear cell populations (satellite cells, FAPs, etc.)…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SkM differentiation, homeostasis, and reprogramming, such as fiber-type switching, relies on SkM-specific regulation of gene expression through SkM lineage-associated TFs, cell signaling, and epigenetics [7-12]. The TF drivers of myogenic differentiation are the four myogenic regulatory TFs encoded by MYOD1, MYF5, MYF6 , and MYOG , whose expression is cell type-specific and regulated by promoters, enhancers and DNA hypomethylation [13-16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%