2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2020.110267
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DNA methylation age estimation in blood samples of living and deceased individuals using a multiplex SNaPshot assay

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
48
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
5
48
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Among the multiple machine learning algorithms adopted for the present study, RFR outperformed the others with a RMSE value of 5.072 years and a MAE value of 4.065 years (R 2 = 0.902), followed by SVR with a MAE of 4.166 years and a RMSE of 5.936 years (R 2 = 0.865). This estimation errors were close to previous predictive models using other biomarkers[8, 15]. RFR model explained 94% of the variation in real and predicted age (±10 years) with the accuracy of a MAE of 3.479 years in the ≤30 years age group and 6.657 years in the older group (≥ 61 years).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Among the multiple machine learning algorithms adopted for the present study, RFR outperformed the others with a RMSE value of 5.072 years and a MAE value of 4.065 years (R 2 = 0.902), followed by SVR with a MAE of 4.166 years and a RMSE of 5.936 years (R 2 = 0.865). This estimation errors were close to previous predictive models using other biomarkers[8, 15]. RFR model explained 94% of the variation in real and predicted age (±10 years) with the accuracy of a MAE of 3.479 years in the ≤30 years age group and 6.657 years in the older group (≥ 61 years).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Although years (R 2 = 0.865). This estimation errors were close to previous predictive models using other biomarkers [8,15]. RFR model explained 94% of the variation in real and predicted age (±10 years) with the accuracy of a MAE of 3.479 years in the ≤30 years age group and 6.657 years in the older group (≥ 61 years).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In a previous study by Dias et al. [13], the DNA methylation status of the CpG sites of the ELOVL2, FHL2, KLF14, MIR29B2C , and TRIM59 genes were obtained from the SeqStudio Genetic Analyzer using SNaPshot products obtained as described in Jung et al. [2].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dias et al. [13], recently reported that applying SNaPshot data obtained from DNA from Portuguese blood to an age prediction model built using SNaPshot data from Korean blood DNA samples [2] resulted in a mean absolute deviation from chronological age (MAD) of 15.26 years, which differs significantly from previous results in Koreans (MAD = 3.48 years). It was suggested that differences in the DNA methylation patterns between the two populations was the cause of the difference in MAD values.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%