New stool tests may be promising tools for future colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. The aim of this review was to summarize current evidence of performance characteristics and practicalness in a population-based screening setting of recently developed stool tests. The MEDLINE database was searched for relevant articles published until July 2004. Studies were included if they comprised more than 10 cases and more than 10 controls. Details on study population, performance characteristics and stool collection procedure were taken into account. Overall, 29 studies, mostly retrospective, were included, investigating 17 different stool markers or marker combinations. Underlying study populations were very heterogeneous and mostly very small. Half of the studies reported sensitivity for adenomas in addition to sensitivity for CRC, and fewer than half reported sensitivity by tumor stage or location. Performance characteristics of stool tests varied to a large extent. For most DNA-based markers, specificity was about 95% or higher, but sensitivity was mostly low even for invasive CRC. More studies with larger sample sizes were done for protein-based markers, which typically had lower specificity. In most studies, stool samples were frozen within a rather short time period after defecation. While promising performance characteristics have been reported for some tests, more pervasive evidence from larger, prospectively designed studies, which also consider aspects of practicalness, e.g., the possibility of mailing the samples, is needed. ' 2005 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
Key words: colorectal cancer; stool testWith more than 900,000 new cases and about 500,000 deaths per year, colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common malignancy in the world. 1 Due to its slow development from endoscopically removable precancerous lesions and from surgically curable early stages, screening provides the opportunity to reduce both morbidity and mortality of the disease. To realize these goals, acceptable and practical screening methods are needed. In contrast to invasive screening methods, stool testing meets crucial criteria of acceptability and practicalness. However, despite its proven efficacy for reducing CRC incidence and mortality, 2,3 the most widely used stool test, fecal occult blood testing (FOBT), has important limitations given its low sensitivity to detect precancerous or cancerous lesions.Deeper insights into molecular changes during tumorigenesis have promoted the development of new stool tests intended to detect exfoliated neoplastic colon cells or cell products in stool. Since Sidranski et al. 4 first demonstrated the feasibility of detecting mutations in the proto-oncogene K-ras in stool of CRC patients, various new stool markers, both DNA-based as well as protein-based, have been investigated. However, the literature published in this field is rather heterogeneous, and the main focus is often on technical challenges.The purpose of this review was to summarize pertinent studies in order to describe the current evidence for ...