1982
DOI: 10.1007/bf00215581
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DNA glycosylases

Abstract: Various DNA glycosylases exist, which initiate the first step in base-excision repair. A summary of the kinetic and physical characteristics of three classes of DNA glycosylases are presented here. The first class discussed, include glycosylases which recognize alkylated DNA. Various data from enzymes derived from both prokaryotic and eukaryotic sources is discussed. The second class deals with a glycosylase that recognizes and initiates the excision of pyrimidine dimers in DNA. To date, this enzyme has only b… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Most derivatives modifi ed at positions 5 and 6 are also ineffective, but 6-aminouracil and 5-azauracil inhibit almost as well as unsubstituted uracil, and 5-fluorouracil is a weak inhibitor (11). These data suggest that the enzyme is able to remove the latter derivaties if incorporated into DNA, and this has already been shown in the case of 5-fl uorouracil (16)(17)(18), which is excised by either the E. coli or human uracil-DNA glycosylase, albeit 20 times more slowly than unsub stituted uracil. In addition, 5-fiuoro-dUTP is a substrate for the cellular dUTPase, so the mechanisms for avoiding incorporation of 5-fl uorouracil into DNA are almost the same as those employed to prevent uracil incorpo ration (16)(17)(18).…”
Section: Dna Glycosylasesmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Most derivatives modifi ed at positions 5 and 6 are also ineffective, but 6-aminouracil and 5-azauracil inhibit almost as well as unsubstituted uracil, and 5-fluorouracil is a weak inhibitor (11). These data suggest that the enzyme is able to remove the latter derivaties if incorporated into DNA, and this has already been shown in the case of 5-fl uorouracil (16)(17)(18), which is excised by either the E. coli or human uracil-DNA glycosylase, albeit 20 times more slowly than unsub stituted uracil. In addition, 5-fiuoro-dUTP is a substrate for the cellular dUTPase, so the mechanisms for avoiding incorporation of 5-fl uorouracil into DNA are almost the same as those employed to prevent uracil incorpo ration (16)(17)(18).…”
Section: Dna Glycosylasesmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…The modified ODNs (Table 1, X ϭ abasic site) were prepared by treating the unmodified ODNs (Table 1, where X is uracil) with uracil DNA glycosylase (UDG) to remove uracil, leaving behind an abasic site [21,22]. For T3U (Table 1, X ϭ abasic site), 15 L of 5'-d(TTUTTT) (0.65 g/L) was mixed with 2 L of 10ϫ UDG buffer (50 mM Tris, pH 7.5, 50 mM NaCl, 5 mM EDTA).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We chose pyrimidine-rich ODNs because our long-range goal is to introduce limited numbers of purines into model ODNs and use them as reaction centers for carcinogens. The chosen ODNs were treated with uracil DNA glycosylase (UDG), which selectively excises uracil from DNA by hydrolyzing the N-glycosidic bonds between uracil and the sugar moiety, leaving behind an abasic site in which an OH replaces the nucleobase [21,22].…”
Section: Molecular Weight and Stability Determinationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This enhancement of repair capacity has been observed with both asynchronous and synchronous cell populations, using various protocols to quantitate DNA repair. The in vitro quantitation of individual DNA repair enzyme activities during cell proliferation demonstrated that increases in the specific activities of the base excision repair enzymes uracil DNA glycosylase (8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)) and 3-methyladenine DNA glycosylase (12) as well as an increase in the specific activity of the 06-methylguanine methyltransferase (14) were dependent on the proliferative state of the cell. These increases in enzyme activity, in the absence of cellular insult, indicated that the induction of repair enzymes was a normal regulatory event during cell proliferation (15,16).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%