DNA Extraction Method Plays a Significant Role When Defining Bacterial Community Composition in the Marine Invertebrate Echinometra mathaei

Abstract

The microbial assemblages of marine organisms play fundamental biological roles in their eukaryotic hosts. Studies aimed at characterizing this diversity have increased over the last decade and with the availability of high-throughput sequencing, we are now able to characterize bacteria that were non-culturable and, therefore, went undetected. With the number of marine microbiome studies growing rapidly, it is increasingly important to develop a set of "best practices" in order to accurately represent the bacterial communities present, and correct for biases. To address this, we sampled the gut communities of the pan-tropical echinoid Echinometra mathaei from two environmentally distinct populations along the Arabian Peninsula. We used three common DNA extraction procedures and compared inferred bacterial diversity from each method through 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene amplicon sequencing. Our results show that the addition of a bead-beating and lysozyme step more effectively capture traditionally difficult to lyse taxa, such as gram-positive bacteria. Further, DNA extraction method plays an important role in estimates of Shannon diversity, with diversity indices significantly higher in both sites combined when a lysozyme and bead beating step was used. Finally, we conducted a literature synthesis to highlight the current diversity of approaches used to characterize the microbiome of marine invertebrates and found that the inclusion of a lysozyme treatment is uncommon (2% of surveyed studies), despite the importance of this step in recovery of rare OTUs as shown in our study.

Tailoring plant-associated microbial inoculants in agriculture: a roadmap for successful application

“…The efficiency of genomic DNA extraction and the number of 16S rRNA copies per cell can vary depending on the bacteria ( Frostegård et al, 1999 ; Klappenbach et al, 2000 ; Shrestha et al, 2007 ; Ketchum et al, 2018 ). Therefore, obtaining accurate abundances of each bacterial strain without knowing the number of 16S rRNA copies within their genomes is an additional limitation.…”

How the ‘kitome’ influences the characterization of bacterial communities in lepidopteran samples with low bacterial biomass

“…The simplicity of the bacterial community in untreated P. brassicae butterflies is likely explaining the lack of significant differences in the composition of the detected adult-associated bacterial community when using different DNA extraction kits. The majority of studies showing a large effect of DNA extraction methods on the retrieved bacterial community composition are focused on animal samples containing robust, taxon-rich bacterial communities (Scupham et al 2007;Yuan et al 2012;Henderson et al 2013;Larsen et al 2015;Burbach et al 2016;Weber et al 2017;Ketchum et al 2018). Lepidoptera, in contrast, are known to be colonized by rather few bacteria taxa (Paniagua Voirol et al 2018).…”

Evaluation of a Highly Efficient DNA Extraction Method for Bacillus anthracis Endospores

“…Therefore, the standard protocol was extended by a lysozyme treatment. The usage of lysozyme is recommended in many protocols for the pre-treatment of Gram-positive bacteria in order to digest the thick peptidoglycan layer to increase the total DNA yield and improve species representation in microbiota composition studies [23][24][25][26]. Indeed, the use of lysozyme for the MasterPure kit increased DNA yields from 469 ± 8 ng to 573 ± 11 ng (per 10 7 cells), which also correlated with a decrease of the C t values of dhp61 qPCR (from 17.60 ± 0.01 to 16.05 ± 0.05).…”