2002
DOI: 10.1179/000349802125000484
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DNA extraction and amplification ofLeishmaniafrom archived, Giemsa-stained slides, for the diagnosis of cutaneous leishmaniasis by PCR

Abstract: DNA was isolated from 92 Giemsa-stained smears of lesions from suspected cases of cutaneous leishmaniasis and used for PCR-based diagnosis of Leishmania infection. Each smear had been examined under a light microscope at x 1,000 and scored for amastigote numbers. Although the smears had been stored for up to 4 years, all the microscopy-positive slides were also positive by PCR and four of the 14 smears that were negative by microscopy (although of lesions that were clinically consistent with leishmaniasis) wer… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
64
1
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
64
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The use of archived Giemsa-stained slides for molecular diagnosis and differentiation of causative agent of CL has been described in several studies (Motazedian et al, 2002;AlJawabreh et al, 2006;Kazemi-Rad et al, 2008). Motazedin et al indicate that the PCR-based checking of Giemsa-stained smears appears to be reasonably sensitive and specific in revealing the presence of Leishmania parasites (or, at least undegraded leishmanial DNA) in such chronic lesions (Motazedian et al, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of archived Giemsa-stained slides for molecular diagnosis and differentiation of causative agent of CL has been described in several studies (Motazedian et al, 2002;AlJawabreh et al, 2006;Kazemi-Rad et al, 2008). Motazedin et al indicate that the PCR-based checking of Giemsa-stained smears appears to be reasonably sensitive and specific in revealing the presence of Leishmania parasites (or, at least undegraded leishmanial DNA) in such chronic lesions (Motazedian et al, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Total DNA was extracted from blood buffy coat as described by Motazedian et al (2002). Briefly, 200 ll of buffy coat was homogenized with 200 ll lyses buffer [50 mM TrisHCl (pH = 7.6), 1 mM EDTA and 1 % Tween 20] and 10 ll of proteinase K solution (containing 19 mg of the enzyme/ ml), in a 1.5 ml micro centrifuge tube.…”
Section: Sample Collection and Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The entire smear was then scraped off the slide, with a sterile scalpel, so that the total DNA in the smear could be extracted by digestion, in a 1.5-ml microcentrifuge tube, with 200 ml lysis buffer [50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.6), 1 mM EDTA, 1% (v/v) Tween 20] containing 8.5 ml of a proteinase-K solution that had 19 mg enzyme/ml (Yokota et al, 1995;Motazedian et al, 2002). The tube was incubated overnight, at 37uC, before 200 ml phenol/chloroform/isoamyl alcohol (25 : 24 : 1, by vol.)…”
Section: Dna Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The resultant supernatant solution was transferred to another tube and mixed with 400 ml absolute ethanol. The DNA that precipitated was centrifuged down (at 60006g for 20 min), dried, dissolved in 50 ml ultrapure water [produced in a PurelabH UHQ system (Siemens Water Technologies, Warrendale, PA)], and stored at 4uC (Motazedian et al, 2002) before use in the PCR-based assay.…”
Section: Dna Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%