2010
DOI: 10.1159/000303328
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DNA Double Strand Breaks and Chromosomal Aberrations

Abstract: DNA double strand breaks (DSBs) are ultimate lesions for the formation of chromosomal aberrations (CAs). The formation of CAs is dependent on many factors; some of these are discussed in this review. FISH methodologies have uncovered CA types which cannot be seen with the classical staining methods, and thereby widened our understanding of the origin of CAs. The mobility of DSBs in interphase nuclei is limited. This makes it especially difficult to understand the origin of complex CAs involving many chromosome… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 141 publications
(43 reference statements)
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The ‘focal’ pattern of CIN we have identified in BRAF mut/MSS cancers may associate with ‘structural’ CIN which involves structural sub-chromosomal rearrangements including deletions, amplifications and translocations [20]. The causes of these types of structural aberrations may involve dysfunctional repair processes of double strand breaks by homologous recombination and the error prone non-homologous end joining [52]. Potentially many of the particularly complex patterns of structural aberrations may not be driver mechanisms in tumourigenesis but instead could be consequences of these disrupted DNA damage and repair processes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ‘focal’ pattern of CIN we have identified in BRAF mut/MSS cancers may associate with ‘structural’ CIN which involves structural sub-chromosomal rearrangements including deletions, amplifications and translocations [20]. The causes of these types of structural aberrations may involve dysfunctional repair processes of double strand breaks by homologous recombination and the error prone non-homologous end joining [52]. Potentially many of the particularly complex patterns of structural aberrations may not be driver mechanisms in tumourigenesis but instead could be consequences of these disrupted DNA damage and repair processes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The occurrence of spatial associations between chromatin segments were proven for centromeres, telomeres, replication origins, enhancers, promoters and chromosome break ends (Cavalli, 2007; Duan et al, 2010; Obe and Durante, 2010; Li et al, 2012; Sanyal et al, 2012; Crevillen et al, 2013; Dekker et al, 2013; Jin et al, 2013). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chromosome aberrations, especially breaks probably act at the G2 phase of the cell cycle (Biswas et al 2004). Clastogenic agents may induce DNA double-strand breaks and lead to either cell cycle arrest or apoptosis (Kastan et al 1991;Bunz et al 1998;Morrison et al 2000;Obe and Durante 2010). The results of this research showed that dioxacarb did not induce a significant increase in CAs compared to the control group and so dioxacarb was not identified as a clastogenic agent.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%