2014
DOI: 10.1007/s00411-014-0531-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DNA double-strand break repair and induction of apoptosis in ex vivo irradiated blood lymphocytes in relation to late normal tissue reactions following breast radiotherapy

Abstract: This study aimed to test whether induction of apoptosis following ex vivo X-irradiation of unstimulated blood lymphocytes correlated with clinical radiosensitivity and DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair in breast radiotherapy patients and healthy volunteers. Using small molecule inhibitors, the relationship between DSB repair and radiation-induced apoptosis was examined. Sixteen breast cancer patients with minimal (controls, n = 8) or extremely marked late radiation-induced change (cases, n = 8) and eight he… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Different X-ray doses were used to study residual DNA damage and mutagenic effects. A dose of 4 Gy X rays allowed us to obtain a sufficient number of residual foci after 24 h. The choice of the latter radiation dose was based on previously published studies in which the c-H2AX/ 53BP1 foci assay was used to correlate residual DNA damage with clinical radiosensitivity in breast cancer patients (21,47). However, for the assessment of chromosomal radiosensitivity of the different cell types, a 2 Gy Xray dose was used.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Different X-ray doses were used to study residual DNA damage and mutagenic effects. A dose of 4 Gy X rays allowed us to obtain a sufficient number of residual foci after 24 h. The choice of the latter radiation dose was based on previously published studies in which the c-H2AX/ 53BP1 foci assay was used to correlate residual DNA damage with clinical radiosensitivity in breast cancer patients (21,47). However, for the assessment of chromosomal radiosensitivity of the different cell types, a 2 Gy Xray dose was used.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, to assess the number of residual DNA DSBs, which may mark unrepaired or misrepaired sites, c-H2AX/53BP1 foci were quantified at 24 h after exposure to 4 Gy X rays. The 4 Gy dose was chosen for the DNA repair experiments, since it is often used for the estimation of radiosensitivity after in vitro irradiation of human lymphocytes (21). Again, colocalizing c-H2AX and 53BP1 foci were scored to make sure that DNA DSBs were analyzed (Fig.…”
Section: Radiation-induced Residual Dna Damage and Mutagenic Effects mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A significant difference between patients with and without late reaction was not confirmed in a case:control study on breast RT patients but here frozen lymphocytes and a smaller dose were used, and apoptosis was detected by forward/sideward scatter (cell size and granularity) (151). A subsequent smaller study (n=16) using fresh lymphocytes from breast RT patients and a fluorescence-labelled inhibitor of caspases (FLICA) to detect apoptosis also found no difference in mean apoptotic fractions (190). Although not all studies were able to show a significant association of lymphocyte apoptosis with normal-tissue reaction, three studies in which associations with late reactions were significant showed a consistent negative correlation between the frequency of apoptosis and the risk of late reaction (194, 212, 213) while increased early cell death correlated with early toxicity (194, 196, 212).…”
Section: Functional Assaysmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…More recently, DSB repair measured using DNA damage foci in ex vivo‐ or in vivo‐irradiated peripheral blood lymphocytes has also been proposed as a predictive marker of individual risk of oral mucositis in head and neck cancer radiotherapy patients [Fleckenstein et al, ; Goutham et al, ; Li et al, ]. Similarly γH2AX foci levels have been associated with the risk of acute [Djuzenova et al, ; Mumbrekar et al, ] and late normal tissue reactions in breast cancer radiotherapy patients [Chua et al, ; Henriquez‐Hernandez et al, ; Chua et al, ], for late toxicity in prostate cancer patients [van Oorschot et al, 2014] and for acute radiotherapy toxicities in paediatric cancer patients [Rübe et al, ]. However, γH2AX foci results had no predictive power for late normal toxicity in gynaecological cancer radiotherapy [Werbrouck et al, ] or in prostate brachytherapy [Olive et al, ], and no genetic influence was observed on individual γH2AX signaling/DSB repair capacity in a nonclinical study involving 198 twins [Garm et al, ].…”
Section: Individual Response/sensitivity/susceptibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%