2015
DOI: 10.1038/nature15518
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DNA-dependent formation of transcription factor pairs alters their binding specificity

Abstract: Gene expression is regulated by transcription factors (TFs), proteins that recognize short DNA sequence motifs. Such sequences are very common in the human genome, and an important determinant of the specificity of gene expression is the cooperative binding of multiple TFs to closely located motifs. However, interactions between DNA-bound TFs have not been systematically characterized. To identify TF pairs that bind cooperatively to DNA, and to characterize their spacing and orientation preferences, we have pe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
468
1
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 473 publications
(480 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
10
468
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Hox proteins from the HD family, for instance, bind in close proximity to their cofactors from the same protein family to unleash their DNA binding specificities Abe et al 2015). It is possible that HM patterns explain the observation that cooperativity can occur promiscuously between TFs from diverse structural families (Jolma et al 2015). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hox proteins from the HD family, for instance, bind in close proximity to their cofactors from the same protein family to unleash their DNA binding specificities Abe et al 2015). It is possible that HM patterns explain the observation that cooperativity can occur promiscuously between TFs from diverse structural families (Jolma et al 2015). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternative methods are needed for capturing genome-wide binding data for many organisms. In vitro TFBS identification methods such as Protein Binding Microarrays (PBM) and High Throughput Systematic Evolution of Ligands by Exponential Enrichment (HT-SELEX) have achieved the highest throughput for deducing TF binding specificities in vitro [9][10][11] , but these methods use short synthetic oligonucleotides lacking secondary DNA modifications and genomic context, both important determinants of selective TF binding in vivo [12][13][14][15][16] . The DAP-seq technique 15 described here employs an in vitro-expressed affinitytagged TF in combination with high-throughput sequencing of a genomic DNA library, allowing for the generation of genome-wide binding site maps reflective of both local sequence context and DNA methylation status.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, because of the closely located binding centers of Shox2 and Pbx genome wide (Fig. S7), and the lack of a Pbx de novo motif -a phenomenon that is typical for cooperative binding of transcription factors (Jolma et al, 2015) -Shox2-TALE co-occupancy appears to be competitive. Moreover, since Hox9/Hox10 proteins were thought to interact with Meis/Pbx to pattern the proximal limb (Capellini et al, 2011;Zakany and Duboule, 2007), the fact that Shox2 interacted directly with Hoxa9 in co-IP assay (Fig.…”
Section: Shox2 Functions As a Dominant Repressor In The Mesenchyme Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%