1990
DOI: 10.1016/0921-8734(90)90018-m
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DNA damage and rpair with age in individual human lymphocytes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
44
0
3

Year Published

1997
1997
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 191 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
6
44
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The only difference observed was significantly higher damage to DNA of leukocytes in the exposed individuals over the age of 50 years compared with control persons of the same age. This finding is in line with results of an earlier paper 39) , which reported that an age-related increase in DNA damage was observed after irradiation of human lymphocytes in vitro.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…The only difference observed was significantly higher damage to DNA of leukocytes in the exposed individuals over the age of 50 years compared with control persons of the same age. This finding is in line with results of an earlier paper 39) , which reported that an age-related increase in DNA damage was observed after irradiation of human lymphocytes in vitro.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Thus, apoptosis in sperm can be assumed to be a parallel pathway to DNA repair in somatic cells because both serve identical functions (namely, to ensure a zero-error transmission either during cell replication or reproduction). We have shown elsewhere an increased level of DNA damage and decreased rate of its repair with aging in somatic cells (93,94). Therefore, our current findings, that DNA damage increases with age and apoptosis decreases with age in sperm, are in accordance with our above speculation that apoptosis and DNA repair are parallel pathways.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…However, it has been shown earlier that while the basal levels of DNA damage in the Comet assay are independent of the age of the donor, an age-dependent increase in DNA damage has been observed immediately after irradiation (Singh et al, 1990). In addition, a nearly four-fold increase in MN in cultures from 80-year-old donors was measured compared with that in the cultures from newborn donors (Fenech and Morley, 1985b), and an age dependent increase of 0.58 MN year À1 was found for a female population (Thierens et al, 2000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%