2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2006.10.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DNA Commission of the International Society for Forensic Genetics (ISFG): Recommendations regarding the role of forensic genetics for disaster victim identification (DVI)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
190
0
6

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 312 publications
(210 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
190
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Not all types of animal bone preserve DNA equally well, and significantly higher proportions of endogenous DNA have been found in dense and heavy bone types such as the petrous bone (50)(51)(52). It is presumed that it is the high density of the bone that leads to reduced bacterial and chemical-mediated decay and improved DNA preservation (50,53). This hypothesis would suggest that fish bones-that are porous, brittle and light-should be a poor source of DNA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Not all types of animal bone preserve DNA equally well, and significantly higher proportions of endogenous DNA have been found in dense and heavy bone types such as the petrous bone (50)(51)(52). It is presumed that it is the high density of the bone that leads to reduced bacterial and chemical-mediated decay and improved DNA preservation (50,53). This hypothesis would suggest that fish bones-that are porous, brittle and light-should be a poor source of DNA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the ensuing 30 years after return of democracy, the ethical, legal and social-political issues surrounding the genetic identification of victims of abduction by the military turned out to be much more complex and nuanced than the technical issues. While forensic genetics became standardized, automated and quite straightforward (Prinz et al 2007;ICRC 2009), the ethical and legal issues unveiled unprecedented social complexities which included (a) the influence on public opinion of a generally conservative mass media which favoured the status quo and only recently began to support the search for, and establishing the identities of, victims of appropriation; (b) the lack of independence of the judicial system, where many judges appointed by the military were still in function and (c) the life experiences of those who had their true identity restored.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The database became DNA-based and automatized, in the early 1990s, and in 2009, Congress put the BNDG under the responsibility of the Ministry of Science and Technology, raising its scientific and ethical standards (MINCYT 2014). Over the past 30 years, the BNDG applied standard forensic genetics techniques (Prinz et al 2007;ICRC 2009) and has identified 116 individuals appropriated at birth or as small children by the military, enabling the restoration of their true genetic identity. This was deemed positive when the inclusion probability of an individual with unknown identity of being a grandchild of putative grandparents was 99.9 % or higher.…”
Section: Bioethics and Genetics In Argentina After The Return Of Demomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here we expand on victim identification, making the simplifying assumption that there is no commingling of remains so that we are solely attempting to make identifications. Rather than working directly with posterior probabilities as in the previous section, we will work with likelihood ratios and prior odds as this is much more common in the disaster victim and personal identification literature (Goodwin et al, 1999;Adams, 2003b;Brenner and Weir, 2003;Alonso et al, 2005;Christensen, 2005;Lin et al, 2006;Steadman et al, 2006;Prinz et al, 2007;Kaye, 2009;Budowle et al, 2011;Butler, 2011;Hartman et al, 2011;Abraham et al, 2012;Montelius and Lindblom, 2012;Jackson and Black, 2013). As mentioned above, likelihood ratios from DNA are typically reported as the inverse of the population frequency for the matched (between ante-mortem and post-mortem) genotype, although this is only possible when a "direct reference" ante-mortem sample is available (so that the numerator is equal to 1.0).…”
Section: Identification In a "Closed Population" Mass Disastermentioning
confidence: 99%