2002
DOI: 10.1016/s1074-5521(02)00116-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DNA-Cation Interactions

Abstract: The interactions between double helical DNA and cations, specifically mono- and divalent metal ions, have recently received increased attention. Molecular dynamics simulations, solution NMR, and X-ray crystallography have all shed light on the coordination of ions in the major and minor grooves of DNA. Metal ion interactions may play key roles in the control of DNA conformation and topology, but despite progress in locating the ions and determining their precise binding modes, it remains difficult to figure ou… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
174
0
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 184 publications
(183 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
7
174
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This binding mode is conserved in crystals of the Dickerson-Drew DNA dodecamer and occurs at the site of a facultative bend into the major groove (52,63). Therefore, cation binding in these crystals is not in any way linked to the presence of arabinonucleosides in the central A-tract of dodecamers.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…This binding mode is conserved in crystals of the Dickerson-Drew DNA dodecamer and occurs at the site of a facultative bend into the major groove (52,63). Therefore, cation binding in these crystals is not in any way linked to the presence of arabinonucleosides in the central A-tract of dodecamers.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…NMR relaxation and atomic absorption spectroscopy measurements with DNA duplexes in solution and DNA fibers, respectively, suggested a preferential interaction with Ca 2+ over Mg 2+ 22, 45 or a similar interaction with these cations 46 . Varying the GC content of the DNA duplex (37%-67%, Supporting Scheme S1 & Table S4) did not change the relative affinities of Ca 2+ and Mg 2+ , providing no indication of a base-specific enhancement of Ca 2+ affinity, as might be anticipated from the apparent preference of inner sphere coordinations of Ca 2+ with guanines 43,47 . Further work will be required to distinguish whether the observed preference arises from a small effective solvation radius for Ca 2+ , from preferential interactions of solvated or partially desolvated Ca 2+ with particular features of the DNA 48 , or from a different mechanism.…”
Section: Competitive Association Of Cations: Assessing the Effects Ofmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…(See the Appendix for the relationship between our analysis and the method from Meisburger et al) It is not clear how accurate this assumption is or whether the same assumption would be valid for highly charged ions (such as Mg 2+ and Sr 2+ ) since the interaction between those ions with nucleic acids is expected to be ion-dependent. [37][38][39][40][41][42] Here, we apply our analysis method to a 25 base-pair duplex DNA. Fig.…”
Section: Duplex Dna In Salt Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%