2014
DOI: 10.1083/jcb.201312078
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DNA breaks and chromosomal aberrations arise when replication meets base excision repair

Abstract: DNA double-strand breaks and chromosomal aberrations after treatment with N-alkylating agents likely arise as a result of replication fork collision with single-strand breaks generated during base excision repair.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
104
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 121 publications
(118 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
12
104
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, we show here that cells expressing XRCC1(R194W) fail to recruit LIG3 to the sites of BER and accumulate higher numbers of micronuclei after exposure to oxidative stress, a likely consequence of the persistence of repair intermediates. Efficient sealing of SSBs in chromosomal DNA during BER is indeed crucial for maintaining genome integrity (49,50). It has been previously observed that a defect in XRCC1 affects a postincision step, the single-strand break rejoining, probably due to a defect in LIG3 (51).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, we show here that cells expressing XRCC1(R194W) fail to recruit LIG3 to the sites of BER and accumulate higher numbers of micronuclei after exposure to oxidative stress, a likely consequence of the persistence of repair intermediates. Efficient sealing of SSBs in chromosomal DNA during BER is indeed crucial for maintaining genome integrity (49,50). It has been previously observed that a defect in XRCC1 affects a postincision step, the single-strand break rejoining, probably due to a defect in LIG3 (51).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evidence is less clear for the 314 involvement of other repair enzymes in PoDs, although the roles 315 of BER and NER in preventing adduct-induced mutations make 316 them likely candidates for low dose protection. fork [54,55]. Therefore, they require immediate further processing.…”
Section: Q2mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In conclusion, from a theoretical perspective it is reasonable to posit that tolerance to low dose levels exists for each requisite step of tumor formation and these tolerance mechanisms are critical in determining thresholds in chemical carcinogenesis. chemicals have a number of barriers to traverse before a molecule 55 reaches the DNA target. Potential reaction with culture media and 56 cellular components (proteins and RNA) would reduce the 57 effective dose of administered chemical to reach and react with 58 DNA.…”
Section: Q2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such DSBs occur at appreciable frequencies endogenously when replication forks encounter spontaneous base damages and/or single-strand breaks but also arise from agents that induce such single-stranded lesions (Ensminger et al, 2014; Jeggo and Löbrich, 2015). In addition to their role in repairing one-ended DSBs, HR factors also exert important functions in protecting stalled replication forks and their absence leads to degradation of newly synthesized DNA (Branzei and Foiani, 2010; Schlacher et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%