2009
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-10-s3-s23
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DNA-binding residues and binding mode prediction with binding-mechanism concerned models

Abstract: BackgroundProtein-DNA interactions are essential for fundamental biological activities including DNA transcription, replication, packaging, repair and rearrangement. Proteins interacting with DNA can be classified into two categories of binding mechanisms - sequence-specific and non-specific binding. Protein-DNA specific binding provides a mechanism to recognize correct nucleotide base pairs for sequence-specific identification. Protein-DNA non-specific binding shows sequence independent interaction for accele… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We have previously developed methods for predicting DNA-binding site residues in proteins from single sequences as well as from evolutionary profiles using neural networks and other machine learning models ( 49 , 50 ). Predictive features in each case share essentially the same local sequence features, even though class labels and hence the trained models differ depending on the carefully prepared datasets ( 24 27 , 51 54 ). These methods have been recently reviewed comprehensively in the context of their predictive performances ( 28 , 51 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have previously developed methods for predicting DNA-binding site residues in proteins from single sequences as well as from evolutionary profiles using neural networks and other machine learning models ( 49 , 50 ). Predictive features in each case share essentially the same local sequence features, even though class labels and hence the trained models differ depending on the carefully prepared datasets ( 24 27 , 51 54 ). These methods have been recently reviewed comprehensively in the context of their predictive performances ( 28 , 51 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the classification, to assess whether a specific aptamer has bound to a particular domain of VEGF 165 , we considered whether the distances between protein side-chain heavy atoms and DNA heavy atoms were within 0.45 nm [50]. More extensive pictorial representations than those in Figure 6 can be found in Figures S2 and S3.…”
Section: Binding Affinity Of Aptamers With Vegf 165mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Where experimental structures are not available, structure prediction is still an important area of research, with Liu et al [ 28 ] presenting a new sequence-based hybrid predictor to identify conformationally ambivalent regions in proteins. Huang et al [ 29 ] have used sequence and structural information to predict DNA-binding residues in transcription factors, while Jongkon et al [ 30 ] have predicted the binding preference of various strains of avian influenza A to cognate human receptors. Prasad et al [ 31 ] have employed RNA secondary structure and sequence motifs for the phylogenetic analysis of flukes.…”
Section: Structural Genomicsmentioning
confidence: 99%