2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbagrm.2019.194408
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DNA binding preferences of S. cerevisiae RNA polymerase I Core Factor reveal a preference for the GC-minor groove and a conserved binding mechanism

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 98 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The observed CF-DNA interactions and footprinting experiments (Fig. 4i and 5a) are overall in good agreement with the results of Jackobel et al 35 who used DNA competitor oligonucleotides to map the minimal, sequence-specific CF binding region from bp −28 to bp −17.
Fig. 5Biochemical characterization of CF promoter recognition. a ExoIII footprinting assay performed on the dsDNA transcription scaffold (−50 to +20) labelled either on the template or non-template strand.
…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The observed CF-DNA interactions and footprinting experiments (Fig. 4i and 5a) are overall in good agreement with the results of Jackobel et al 35 who used DNA competitor oligonucleotides to map the minimal, sequence-specific CF binding region from bp −28 to bp −17.
Fig. 5Biochemical characterization of CF promoter recognition. a ExoIII footprinting assay performed on the dsDNA transcription scaffold (−50 to +20) labelled either on the template or non-template strand.
…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…We further found that CX-5461 did not affect promoter occupancy by SL1 (TAF1B) or by UBF in NIH3T3 ( Supplementary Figures S2B and S3C ) or HEK293T cells ( Supplementary Figure S2C ). This excludes the possibility that the drug acts by preventing promoter recruitment of SL1 as was previously suggested ( 9 , 61 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…Previous studies had suggested that the ability of CX-5461 to inhibit rDNA transcription was the result of inhibition of SL1 binding to the 47S promoter ( 9 , 61 ). However, our data clearly showed that neither SL1 nor UBF binding at the 47S or Spacer promoters was inhibited by CX-5461, excluding this as the mechanism of drug action.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4). Sequence specificity is determined by proximal upstream bendability 15,65 and distal upstream recognition by UAF, which is linked to the PIC via CF and TBP. Divergent TFIIB reader-loop elements within Rrn7 are placed in the Pol I cleft, may play a role in duplex-destabilization and bind the melted template strand similar to observations in ITCs 17 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%