2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2015.02.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DNA barcoding for identification of sand fly species (Diptera: Psychodidae) from leishmaniasis-endemic areas of Peru

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
54
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
54
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, 2% intraspecific divergence may indicate the existence of hidden species in Lepidoptera [11, 74]. However, within Diptera, this level of divergence only represents an intraspecific difference [7577]. In the suborder Heteroptera, threshold value of 2.2% has been applied for DNA barcode based species delimitation [7879].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, 2% intraspecific divergence may indicate the existence of hidden species in Lepidoptera [11, 74]. However, within Diptera, this level of divergence only represents an intraspecific difference [7577]. In the suborder Heteroptera, threshold value of 2.2% has been applied for DNA barcode based species delimitation [7879].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a fixed threshold of COI sequences is not appropriate for all taxonomic groups. In insects for instance, a 2% threshold provides effective identification at the species level of Ephemeroptera (Schmidt et al 2015;Webb et al 2012;Zhou et al 2010), Lepidoptera (Zahiri et al 2014) and Trichoptera (Zhou et al 2016), while a 2.2% threshold appears appropriate for Heteroptera (Knebelsberger et al 2014), 2.5% for aquatic beetles (Monaghan et al 2005), and >3% for various dipteran groups (Nzelu et al 2015;Renaud et al 2012). Furthermore, an average threshold of 4-5% appears appropriate for most Chironomidae (Lin et al 2015;Meier et al 2015), even if a 7% threshold has been reported for closely related species in this family (Carew & Hoffmann 2015).…”
Section: Dna Barcodes and Morphospeciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Molecular methods based on various genetic markers have been developed to overcome this issue (Depaquit 2014). So far, two techniques have been mainly used for molecular identifications of sand flies: the polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment-length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP; Aransay et al 1999;Terayama et al 2008;Latrofa et al 2012;Tiwary et al 2012;Minter et al 2013) and DNA barcoding (Kr€ uger et al 2011;Kumar et al 2012;Contreras Guti errez et al 2014;Al-Ajmi et al 2015;Maia et al 2015;Nzelu et al 2015;Romero-Ricardo et al 2016). DNA barcoding consists in the sequencing of a short standard DNA marker for the taxonomic assignment of a sample by looking for the closest match in a reference database (Hebert et al 2003a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, the reliability of DNA metabarcoding to identify sand flies fly species contained in bulk samples is assessed. The current standard barcode for animals is a c. 650-bp portion of the mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 gene (COI) which was already proved useful for the identification of Neotropical sand flies (Contreras Guti errez et al 2014;Nzelu et al 2015;Romero-Ricardo et al 2016). The standard COI barcode is however not well suited for metabarcoding applications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%