2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2008.09.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DNA barcoding for ecologists

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
728
0
5

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 869 publications
(764 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
2
728
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Here, a small variable part of the genome (usually from mitochondria or chloroplasts) is amplified from unidentified or complex samples, and sequenced using NGS. The sequence information is then used to identify the species present in the sample (Valentini et al, 2009). Studies using this approach have, for example, investigated the diet of a variety of animals by sequencing faecal samples (Deagle et al, 2009), and characterized the extinct mammalian fauna using ancient DNA from frozen tundra sediment (Haile et al, 2009).…”
Section: Targeted Sequencingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, a small variable part of the genome (usually from mitochondria or chloroplasts) is amplified from unidentified or complex samples, and sequenced using NGS. The sequence information is then used to identify the species present in the sample (Valentini et al, 2009). Studies using this approach have, for example, investigated the diet of a variety of animals by sequencing faecal samples (Deagle et al, 2009), and characterized the extinct mammalian fauna using ancient DNA from frozen tundra sediment (Haile et al, 2009).…”
Section: Targeted Sequencingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in many biodiversity hotspots, the botanical inventory is usually incomplete, perhaps because taxonomic assignment is frustrated by low discriminatory power of morphological descriptors for very closely related species (Francisco‐Ortega et al., 2007; Zanoni, 1989). DNA barcoding has the potential to support species identification and discovery, vegetation, and floristic species surveys, in addition to studies on ecological forensics, all of which are critical to biodiversity management (Hollingsworth, Li, van der Bank, & Twyford, 2016; Valentini, Pompanon, & Taberlet, 2008; von Crautlein, Korpelainen, Pietiläinen, & Rikkinen, 2011). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonetheless, traditional detection methods can have logistic limitations, be time consuming, expensive, and in some cases, harmful to the environment (e.g., marine bottom trawls, electrofishing and rotenone poisoning) (Thomsen et al, 2012b). The advent of novel molecular and forensic methods have provided innovative tools for detecting marine and aquatic organisms that may circumvent the aforementioned limitations (Darling & Blum, 2007;valentini, Pompano, & Taberlet, 2009;Lodge et al, 2012).One such tool is the detection of an organism's environmental DNA (eDNA). Defined as short DNA fragments that an organism leaves behind in non-living components of the ecosystem (i.e., water, air or sediments), eDNA is derived from either cellular DNA present in epithelial cells released by organisms to the environment through skin, urine, feces or mucus or extracellular DNA that is the DNA in the environment resulting from cell death and subsequent destruction of cell structure (Foote, Thomsen, Sveegaard, Wahlberg, Kielgast, Kyhn, Salling, Galatius, Orlando, & Gilbert, 2012;Taberlet, Coissac, Hajibabaei, & Rieseberg, 2012a).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonetheless, traditional detection methods can have logistic limitations, be time consuming, expensive, and in some cases, harmful to the environment (e.g., marine bottom trawls, electrofishing and rotenone poisoning) (Thomsen et al, 2012b). The advent of novel molecular and forensic methods have provided innovative tools for detecting marine and aquatic organisms that may circumvent the aforementioned limitations (Darling & Blum, 2007;valentini, Pompano, & Taberlet, 2009;Lodge et al, 2012).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%