2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2016.03.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DNA barcoding and wing morphometrics to distinguish three Aedes vectors in Thailand

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
72
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
8
72
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, when calculated on the standard COI sequence (Hebert et al, 2003) employed for DNA barcoding, the maximum intraspecific divergence was 0.012 (eight mutations in 658 bp), a value in line with those recently reported for A. scutellaris (0.008) and A. aegypti (0.022), but much greater than the value previously reported for A. albopictus (0.002; Sumruayphol et al, 2016). …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Indeed, when calculated on the standard COI sequence (Hebert et al, 2003) employed for DNA barcoding, the maximum intraspecific divergence was 0.012 (eight mutations in 658 bp), a value in line with those recently reported for A. scutellaris (0.008) and A. aegypti (0.022), but much greater than the value previously reported for A. albopictus (0.002; Sumruayphol et al, 2016). …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Geometric morphometrics is increasingly applied to medically and economically important insects to distinguish morphologically similar species, especially cryptic taxa, and to detect intraspecific variation (Dujardin 2008, Ruangsittichai et al 2011, Lorenz et al 2012, Dujardin and Kitthawee 2013, Morales Vargas et al 2013, Demari-Silva et al 2014, Jaramillo-O et al 2015, Sumruayphol et al 2016). Wing veins provide many well-defined landmarks suitable for the landmark-based approach (Villegas et al 2002).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Diptera, the wing measurements were used successfully for the quantification of both within and between species variations (Brown 1980; Klingenberg et al 1998; Alves and Bélo 2002; Hall et al 2014; Siomava et al 2016). The wing venation differs markedly between Diptera species, and it can be used for identification of mosquitoes (Dujardin 2011; Sumruayphol et al 2016), tephritid flies (Van Cann et al 2015), tsetse flies (Kaba et al 2016), screwworm flies (Lyra et al 2010), and stable flies (Changbunjong et al 2016). Our study is the first extensive attempt to investigate the usefulness of wing measurements for the identification of dipterans reported from animal carrion and dead human bodies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%