2022
DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2022.764255
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DNA Barcoding and Phylogenomic Analysis of the Genus Fritillaria in China Based on Complete Chloroplast Genomes

Abstract: The Fritillaria is an extremely complicated genus in taxonomy and phylogeny, which contains numerous medicinal species in China. Both traditional characteristic-based taxonomy and universal DNA barcodes (ITS, trnH-psbA, and rbcL) are difficult to effectively identify the species. Here, we generated a large dataset of chloroplast genomes from multiple accessions per species of Fritillaria to evaluate their effectiveness in species discrimination. Moreover, phylogeny of species in China was explored based on the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
22
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
2
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, the direct reason for failing in species identification was the lack of genetic variation within the DNA barcode regions we applied in Schima . The sequence divergence of Schima was much lower than that observed in Fritillaria and Olea , on which DNA barcodes worked effectively (Chen et al, 2022; Dong et al, 2021). Shallow sequence divergence indicates a recent evolutionary history in Schima .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…First, the direct reason for failing in species identification was the lack of genetic variation within the DNA barcode regions we applied in Schima . The sequence divergence of Schima was much lower than that observed in Fritillaria and Olea , on which DNA barcodes worked effectively (Chen et al, 2022; Dong et al, 2021). Shallow sequence divergence indicates a recent evolutionary history in Schima .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Since complete plastome and nrDNA arrays were proposed to be the next generation DNA barcodes for plant species identification (Coissac et al, 2016; Hollingsworth et al, 2016; Kane et al, 2012; Kane & Cronk, 2008; Li et al, 2015; Nock et al, 2011), much advancement has gone into molecular species identification of taxonomically difficult taxa, such as Panax (Araliaceae) with 70% of species discriminated (Ji et al, 2019), and Taxus (Taxaceae) with all species (100%) discriminated (Fu et al, 2019). Despite a steep increase in super‐barcode‐related studies (Chen et al, 2022; Dong et al, 2021; Ślipiko et al, 2020; Wang et al, 2018), the discriminatory power of super‐barcodes remains controversial. Some studies argue that the power of super‐barcodes as a species identification tool is quite limited (Krawczyk et al, 2018; Liu et al, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…D. leptopodum contained the highest number (50) of long repeat sequences, and Me. horridula had the lowest number (16) among the compared species. The numbers of forward and palindromic sequence repeats detected in D. leptopodum were 46 and 4, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…The chloroplast genome, which is characterized primarily by maternal inheritance, has been widely used in the reconstruction of phylogenetic relationships at different taxonomic levels [11][12][13][14][15] and species identification [16] due to its highly conserved nature in terms of stable structure, gene arrangement, GC (guanine and cytosine) content, and lack of recombination during genetic processes. To date, most of the studies on Dicranostigma have focused mainly on the medicinal properties of its extracts [1,2], ecophysiological index, and seed germination characteristics [5]; in contrast, almost no research has been conducted on its phylogeny.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chloroplast genome sequences are commonly used in various areas of biology, i.e., phylogenetics [37,38], DNA barcoding [39,40], taxonomy, evolution, and population genetics [41] of both angiosperms and gymnosperms. In the last five years, many genomic studies of various representatives of the genus Dracaena [25,26] and the family Asparagaceae [22,23,42,43] have also been published, but so far, none have included D. cinnabari.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%