2013
DOI: 10.1002/ange.201305835
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DNA as a Molecular Local Thermal Probe for the Analysis of Magnetic Hyperthermia

Abstract: Überhitzt: Die Umgebung magnetischer Nanopartikel kann durch ein Magnetfeld erhitzt werden. Polymer‐beschichtete magnetische Nanopartikel wurden mit Einzelstrang‐DNA funktionalisiert, die wiederum an unterschiedliche Fluorophor‐modifizierte DNA gebunden wurde. Durch Korrelation des Denaturierungsprofils der DNA mit der lokalen Temperatur konnten Temperaturgradienten in der unmittelbaren Umgebung der Nanopartikel bestimmt werden.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
65
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
4
65
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Reidinger et al have indirectly measured temperatures within 0.5 nm of a MNP surface, and have observed an increase in temperature as high as 45 °C upon application of a high frequency magnetic field at frequency of 334.5 kHz and field strength in the range of 7.2 – 13.5 kA/m *43+. Similar results have been published by Dias et al, where the temperature at 5.6 nm (ten times more than Riedinger et al) away from the MNP surface was found to be 6 °C higher than the bulk fluid temperature [43, 45]. Based on these observations, no major difference would be seen in the fluorescent intensity of RhB-PCL, unless the RhB was located within a few nanometers of MNP surfaces.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Reidinger et al have indirectly measured temperatures within 0.5 nm of a MNP surface, and have observed an increase in temperature as high as 45 °C upon application of a high frequency magnetic field at frequency of 334.5 kHz and field strength in the range of 7.2 – 13.5 kA/m *43+. Similar results have been published by Dias et al, where the temperature at 5.6 nm (ten times more than Riedinger et al) away from the MNP surface was found to be 6 °C higher than the bulk fluid temperature [43, 45]. Based on these observations, no major difference would be seen in the fluorescent intensity of RhB-PCL, unless the RhB was located within a few nanometers of MNP surfaces.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The local temperature inside the micelle core when subjected to magnetic field is higher than the bulk fluid temperature, but the error in temperature measurement of ± 1.5 °C using the fluoroptic probe implies that this difference may not be significant (Table 2). Also, during this process the temperature inside the core of micelles did not reach hyperthermia conditions over a period of 20 minutes, suggesting that (1) the distance between the fluorophores and the MNP surfaces was larger than few nanometers [43, 45], and (2) that a greater concentration of MNPs inside the micelles may be necessary to reach temperatures needed to melt the micelle cores.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One possible drawback to the photothermal measurements described above is that temperature is measured on the bulk scale and not on the surface of the nanoparticle where the heat is transduced. There are thermometry techniques that can provide this local temperature information, [22][23][24] but these require more complicated sample preparation, making them more challenging to implement. Finally, the measurements described here could easily be combined with other techniques (e.g., photocatalytic degradation) 9 to assess photothermal effects on different processes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Riedinger et al demonstrated that the temperature increased to 45 ∘ C within 0.5 nm of MNPs surface when exposed to an AMF (13.5 kA/m, 334.5 kHz) and decreased exponentially with increasing distance [73]. Dias et al observed a high temperature (8.3 ∘ C) at a distance of 5 nm from the nanoparticle (12 nm in diameter) surface under a harsh AMF (25 kA/m, 835.25 kHz); moreover, the temperature rise decreased with distance [74]. From the point of view of these results, the local high temperature around MNPs may damage cell or organelle membrane, resulting in the release of cathepsins [70] from lysosomes in magnetic hyperthermia and then causing cell apoptosis or death.…”
Section: Mechanismsmentioning
confidence: 99%