2002
DOI: 10.17221/6108-cjgpb
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DNA analyses and their applications in plant breeding

Abstract: Abstract:In recent years, molecular markers have been developed based on the more detailed knowledge of genome structure. Considerable emphasis has been laid on the use of molecular markers in practical breeding and genotype identification. This review attempts to give an account of different molecular markers currently available for genome mapping and for tagging different traits -restriction fragment length polymorphisms (RFLPs), random amplified polymorphic DNAs (RAPDs), amplified fragment length polymorphi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 105 publications
0
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This coincides with the observations found in other monocots, viz., rice bean and barley by Muthusamy and Fernandez et al,respectively [42,43]. AFLP technology is another powerful tool for detection and evolution in germplasm collections and in the screening of biodiversity as well as for fingerprinting studies [44][45][46]. It is also clear from the present investigation that AFLP technique was able to differentiate intraspecific relations of the Curcuma species by a higher number of unique markers compared to RAPD and ISSR techniques.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 50%
“…This coincides with the observations found in other monocots, viz., rice bean and barley by Muthusamy and Fernandez et al,respectively [42,43]. AFLP technology is another powerful tool for detection and evolution in germplasm collections and in the screening of biodiversity as well as for fingerprinting studies [44][45][46]. It is also clear from the present investigation that AFLP technique was able to differentiate intraspecific relations of the Curcuma species by a higher number of unique markers compared to RAPD and ISSR techniques.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 50%
“…Among others, it is due to different sensitivity, reproducibility and reliability of the methods employed. The AFLP method is known to be highly sensitive and more reliable as compared to RAPD method (Ovesná et al 2002).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specific DNA profiles were generated for each line, which can make further evaluation of marker segregation possible. Especially SSR profiles of individual lines can be further used to monitor the share of parental genomes by backcrossing to select most promising lines (Ovesná et al 2002). Based on preliminary screening susceptible line PI 383933, resistant line PEC 210 and resistant cultivar Chevron were used for DH lines development.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%