2008
DOI: 10.1038/onc.2008.98
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DNA amplification is a ubiquitous mechanism of oncogene activation in lung and other cancers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
126
1
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(131 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
3
126
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, a recent study on CDK5-mediated regulation of the PIKE-A-Akt pathway suggests an important clue to the association of CDK5 with tumorigenesis, as the accumulation of phosphorylated PIKE-A (PI3-kinase enhancer), a recently identified GTP-binding protein shown to regulate the PI3K-Akt pathway and activation of Akt in the nucleus of glioblastoma cell, is a CDK5-dependent activity, 23 suggesting possible association of CDK5 with non-neuronal cell survival. This was further supported by another study that showed the overexpression of CDK5, along with the other downstream components of the EGFR-family signaling pathway, such as AKT1 and SHC1, as a direct result of gene amplification, specifically in lung cancer cells, 17 signifying that the alteration of the CDK5 gene may play a causal role in the development of lung cancer. In this study, we evaluated the associations between three newly found SNPs (À904 G4A, À270 C4G and À238 A4C) in the promoter region of the CDK5 gene and the risk for lung cancer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Indeed, a recent study on CDK5-mediated regulation of the PIKE-A-Akt pathway suggests an important clue to the association of CDK5 with tumorigenesis, as the accumulation of phosphorylated PIKE-A (PI3-kinase enhancer), a recently identified GTP-binding protein shown to regulate the PI3K-Akt pathway and activation of Akt in the nucleus of glioblastoma cell, is a CDK5-dependent activity, 23 suggesting possible association of CDK5 with non-neuronal cell survival. This was further supported by another study that showed the overexpression of CDK5, along with the other downstream components of the EGFR-family signaling pathway, such as AKT1 and SHC1, as a direct result of gene amplification, specifically in lung cancer cells, 17 signifying that the alteration of the CDK5 gene may play a causal role in the development of lung cancer. In this study, we evaluated the associations between three newly found SNPs (À904 G4A, À270 C4G and À238 A4C) in the promoter region of the CDK5 gene and the risk for lung cancer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…16 Frequent amplification and overexpression of the CDK5 gene along with multiple epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-family-signaling pathway components, including SHC1, AKT1 and MYC, was recently discovered in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). 17 As it has been known earlier that CDK5/p35 activation by neuregulin subsequently activates PI3K and Akt through ErbB3 and ErbB2 receptors in cultured cortical neurons, 18 the activation of CDK5, along with the other genes, may play a role in NSCLC tumorigenesis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Overexpression of cdk5 has been shown in lung cancer (20). The single-nucleotide polymorphisms in the cdk5 promoter was also found and correlated with an increased risk of lung cancer (18).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(F) RBPJ mRNA expression in normal bronchial epithelium collected from healthy individuals (n = 67) versus non-small cell lung carcinoma (n = 111; Bild et al, 2006;Lockwood et al, 2010). (G) Analysis of lung cancers of mixed type with RBPJ genomic copy loss (n = 14) versus no loss (n = 30) with paired mRNA expression and aCGH data (Lockwood et al, 2008(Lockwood et al, , 2010. (H) Analysis of lung cancers from G broken down into tumor subtypes; adenocarcinoma RBPJ genomic loss (n = 6) versus no loss (n = 19); squamous cell carcinoma RBPJ genomic loss (n = 8) versus no loss (n = 11; Lockwood et al, 2008Lockwood et al, , 2010.…”
Section: Rbpj Is Frequently Lost In Human Cancersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(G) Analysis of lung cancers of mixed type with RBPJ genomic copy loss (n = 14) versus no loss (n = 30) with paired mRNA expression and aCGH data (Lockwood et al, 2008(Lockwood et al, , 2010. (H) Analysis of lung cancers from G broken down into tumor subtypes; adenocarcinoma RBPJ genomic loss (n = 6) versus no loss (n = 19); squamous cell carcinoma RBPJ genomic loss (n = 8) versus no loss (n = 11; Lockwood et al, 2008Lockwood et al, , 2010. (I) Analysis of RBPJ mRNA expression and genomic copy number in TCGA lung cancer adenocarcinomas (RBPJ genomic loss [n = 15] versus no loss [n = 114]) and squamous cell carcinomas (RBPJ genomic loss [n = 77] versus no loss [n = 101]; Cerami et al, 2012;Lockwood et al, 2012;Gao et al, 2013).…”
Section: Rbpj Is Frequently Lost In Human Cancersmentioning
confidence: 99%