Nime 2021
DOI: 10.21428/92fbeb44.87f1d63e
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DMI Apprenticeship: Sharing and Replicating Musical Artefacts

Abstract: The nature of digital musical instruments (DMIs), often bespoke artefacts devised by single or small groups of technologists, requires thought about how they are shared and archived so that others can replicate or adapt designs. The ability for replication contributes to an instrument's longevity and creates opportunities for both DMI designers and researchers. Research papers often omit necessary knowledge for replicating research artefacts, but we argue that mitigating this situation is not just about includ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has also proven to be noticeably sustainable, with three years of development so far and no signs yet of slowing down. We note a similar collaborative relationship between, for example, Rebecca Fiebrink and Laetitia Sonami facilitating over 8 years of ongoing development of Wekinator and the Spring Spyre [21], or Joseph Malloch and Andrew Stewart's roles in the development and support of the T-Stick [22][23] and its growing community of practitioners [24]. Although there is no doubt that numerous other participants and contributors have played essential roles in these projects (the mubone included), this kind of central collaborative duo, with a technical artist and artistic technician, may still be a useful model for NIME research, providing a stable core that could improve the longevity and reliability of the instruments and technology developed compared to solo or large group research.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…It has also proven to be noticeably sustainable, with three years of development so far and no signs yet of slowing down. We note a similar collaborative relationship between, for example, Rebecca Fiebrink and Laetitia Sonami facilitating over 8 years of ongoing development of Wekinator and the Spring Spyre [21], or Joseph Malloch and Andrew Stewart's roles in the development and support of the T-Stick [22][23] and its growing community of practitioners [24]. Although there is no doubt that numerous other participants and contributors have played essential roles in these projects (the mubone included), this kind of central collaborative duo, with a technical artist and artistic technician, may still be a useful model for NIME research, providing a stable core that could improve the longevity and reliability of the instruments and technology developed compared to solo or large group research.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Combining small scale studies and "art-research inquiry" [30] in our "machinic encounters" [31] has allowed us to begin to see promising connections, between the music interaction affordances and sensorimotor disruptions [32] of nonlinear dynamics [33][34], and their impact on advanced skill learning [35], AI mind perception in the case of E3P1 [36][37], and AI expectation violation in the case of E3P2 [38]. However, we did so in only very short glimpses, and with an extremely limited vocabulary.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%