2017
DOI: 10.7566/jpsj.86.114706
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DMFT Study on the Electron–hole Asymmetry of the Electron Correlation Strength in the High Tc Cuprates

Abstract: Recent experiments revealed a striking asymmetry in the phase diagram of the high temperature cuprate superconductors. The correlation effect seems strong in the hole-doped systems and weak in the electrondoped systems. On the other hand, a recent theoretical study shows that the interaction strengths (the Hubbard U ) are comparable in these systems. Therefore, it is difficult to explain this asymmetry by their interaction strengths. Given this background, we analyze the one-particle spectrum of a single band … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this picture, the smaller effective U in NCCO than in LSCO yields the larger N eff /Cu in NCCO than in LSCO. Similar scenarios have also been suggested by other theoretical works 10,18,34 Lastly, it should be interesting to note that Nd and Pr have magnetic moments while La does not. Because PLCCO has a relatively higher ratio of the non-magnetic La element than NCCO or PCCO, the formation of a 3-dimensional antiferromagnetic phase is more difficult in PLCCO than in NCCO or PCCO.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this picture, the smaller effective U in NCCO than in LSCO yields the larger N eff /Cu in NCCO than in LSCO. Similar scenarios have also been suggested by other theoretical works 10,18,34 Lastly, it should be interesting to note that Nd and Pr have magnetic moments while La does not. Because PLCCO has a relatively higher ratio of the non-magnetic La element than NCCO or PCCO, the formation of a 3-dimensional antiferromagnetic phase is more difficult in PLCCO than in NCCO or PCCO.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…. Electrostatically, it means that the electron-doped system with the T' structure lacks the apical oxygen, which effectively reduces the correlation strength U/t, where t is the hopping parameter34 . From this perspective, because the longer Cu-O bonding length of PLCCO than NCCO can provide a larger effective correlation strength (U/t) because of the smaller t, the carriers will be more localized, leading to a smaller N eff /Cu in PLCCO than in NCCO.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%