2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2016.06.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DLS and zeta potential – What they are and what they are not?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

68
1,673
0
42

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2,637 publications
(1,791 citation statements)
references
References 125 publications
68
1,673
0
42
Order By: Relevance
“…In such applications, the particle surface is in a constantly changing, dynamic state, where proteins in the body absorb onto the particle forming a corona [10]. Changes in ionic strengths and molecules present in the environment can cause changes in the composition and size of this corona, and so the hydrodynamic diameter provides a means to characterise the particle under these conditions [11]. More typical characterisation approaches such as EM imaging would have difficulty in measuring such processes due to the nature of the technique and the possibility of introducing artefacts during sample preparation.…”
Section: Np Characterisation: Different Techniques For Sizingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In such applications, the particle surface is in a constantly changing, dynamic state, where proteins in the body absorb onto the particle forming a corona [10]. Changes in ionic strengths and molecules present in the environment can cause changes in the composition and size of this corona, and so the hydrodynamic diameter provides a means to characterise the particle under these conditions [11]. More typical characterisation approaches such as EM imaging would have difficulty in measuring such processes due to the nature of the technique and the possibility of introducing artefacts during sample preparation.…”
Section: Np Characterisation: Different Techniques For Sizingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On a practical level, the most user friendly instrument used here was the DLS. The process is mostly automated with comparatively few possible issues during measurements 19,48 . DCS and NTA are available and usable by a capable professional, however there are some pitfalls.…”
Section: Particle Size Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…39 Particle size and surface charge and are the two most frequently referred factors that are responsible for the enhanced biological effects of nanoparticles including cellular uptake, toxicity and dissolution. 40 Despite giving informations about the interactions with the ocular tissues, zeta potential values also gives preliminary data for the prediciton of the physical stability of particle dispersions. 41 Guidelines classifying nanoparticle dispersions with zeta potential values of ±0-10 mV, ±10-20 mV and ±20-30 mV and >±30 mV as highly unstable, relatively stable, moderately stable and highly stable, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…41 Guidelines classifying nanoparticle dispersions with zeta potential values of ±0-10 mV, ±10-20 mV and ±20-30 mV and >±30 mV as highly unstable, relatively stable, moderately stable and highly stable, respectively. 40,42 Since the corneal and conjunctival surfaces are negatively charged, main approach for the enhancement of ocular bioavailability cationic drug delivery systems are being preferred considering possesment of enhanced bioavailability due to the electrostatic interactions between the surfaces. 24,[43][44][45][46] However anionic drug delivery systems also can enhance ocular bioavailability by the help of monocarboxylate transport which processes a proton or Na + -coupled lactate systems in epithelial cells which may enhance the ocular bioavailability of the anionic drugs in a great extent.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%