2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-93818-9_49
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DL-GSA: A Deep Learning Metaheuristic Approach to Missing Data Imputation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, some recently developed methods that can handle mixed missing data are SICE [24], FEMI [25], and HCMM-LD [26]. When the sample sizes are large enough compared to the number of features, deep learning techniques such as Multiple Imputation Using Deep Denoising Autoencoders [15], DL-GSA [7], and Swarm Intelligence-Deep Neural Network [27] can be powerful imputers. However, it is worth noting that deep learning methods usually require more data than statistical imputation approaches.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In addition, some recently developed methods that can handle mixed missing data are SICE [24], FEMI [25], and HCMM-LD [26]. When the sample sizes are large enough compared to the number of features, deep learning techniques such as Multiple Imputation Using Deep Denoising Autoencoders [15], DL-GSA [7], and Swarm Intelligence-Deep Neural Network [27] can be powerful imputers. However, it is worth noting that deep learning methods usually require more data than statistical imputation approaches.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite recent efforts in directly handling missing data [1][2][3][4], missing data imputation approaches [5][6][7] remain commonly used. This is because directly handling missing data can be complicated and usually are developed for specific target problems or models, while imputation can be more versatile.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, deep learning techniques also form another dominant class of imputation methods. Those techniques include multiple imputations using Deep Denoising Autoencoders [26], imputation via Stacked Denoising Autoencoders [8], imputation via Adversarially-trained Graph Convolutional Networks [27], a Swarm Intelligence-deep neural network [28], combining Gravitational search algorithm with a deep-autoencoder [29], Generative Adversarial Multiple Imputation Network [30], etc. Hence, they are not applicable to small data sets.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Deep learning techniques also form another dominant class of imputation methods. Those techniques include multiple imputations using Deep Denoising Autoencoders [32], imputation via Stacked Denoising Autoencoders [12], imputation via Adversarially-trained Graph Convolutional Networks [33], a Swarm Intelligence-deep neural network [34], combining Gravitational search algorithm with a deep-autoencoder [35]. However, a significant drawback of deep learning methods is the need for a lot of data.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%