Eicerpted .from t i paper t.oninti.ssioned b! the Committee on Child Development Research and Puhlic Po1it.i. crnd supported by Contrcicr N o . ASU000001-05 benreen the National lnstitute of Child Hecilth cind Hunitin Dewlopmenr trnd the Ncitit~nal Academ! of Science., . D 1988 American Orthopsychiatric Association, Inc. 355 * The terminology used in previous reviews, and indeed in the present review, implies a specific causational model: the event of divorce causes more negative reactions in boys than in girls. What the data actually assess is the psychological status of children subsequent to divorce. Recent evidence suggests that group differences, and the pattern of sex differences, anredare the family disruption (Block, Block & Gjerde, 1986). Thus it is unclear to what extent differences in children following divorce reflect predivorce family stress, the actual separation, postdivorce disequilibrium, or even long-standing differences in child behavior that may have contributed to family stress and parental separation. The use of terminology like "boys' vs girls' response to divorce" in the present review is for ease of reading and must be understood as an oversimplification of more complex and little understood processes associated with child outcomes.* In Zill (1978) an analysis is reported for a single variable in which both child sex and family status are considered, and family status is defined specifically in terms of divorce.