2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejc.2006.06.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Divisibility of countable metric spaces

Abstract: Prompted by a recent question of G. Hjorth [12] as to whether a bounded Urysohn space is indivisible, that is to say has the property that any partition into finitely many pieces has one piece which contains an isometric copy of the space, we answer this question and more generally investigate partitions of countable metric spaces.We show that an indivisible metric space must be totally Cantor disconnected, which implies in particular that every Urysohn space U V with V bounded or not but dense in some initial… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
93
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(105 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
(24 reference statements)
3
93
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Remark that under our assumptions on S, the space U S always exists and is unique, according to Theorem 1.4 and Example 1.5.3 in [6]. Now in the case S = {0, 1, 2} (a convex subset of the semigroup N of natural numbers) one recovers Hrushovski's theorem 3.7, while the case S = R gives the Solecki-Vershik theorem 3.8.…”
Section: Acknowledgementsmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Remark that under our assumptions on S, the space U S always exists and is unique, according to Theorem 1.4 and Example 1.5.3 in [6]. Now in the case S = {0, 1, 2} (a convex subset of the semigroup N of natural numbers) one recovers Hrushovski's theorem 3.7, while the case S = R gives the Solecki-Vershik theorem 3.8.…”
Section: Acknowledgementsmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…U X need not exist as is demonstrated by the failure of the amalgamation property. However this is characterized in [4] by 4-value property.…”
Section: Other Metrics Other Structuresmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The following case to consider is S 3 , which turns out to be another particular case thanks to an observation made in [3].…”
Section: Are the S M 'S Indivisible?mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…We do not write more here but the interested reader is referred to [3], section on the indivisibility of Urysohn spaces, for more details.…”
Section: Theorem (Delhommé-laflamme-pouzet-sauer [3]) S 3 Is Indivimentioning
confidence: 99%