Dividends, Asymmetric Information, and Agency Conflicts: Evidence from a Comparison of the Dividend Policies of Japanese and U.S. Firms

Abstract

We compare dividend policies of U.S. and Japanese firms, partitioning the Japanese data into keiretsu, independent, and hybrid firms. We examine the correlation between dividend changes and stock returns, and the reluctance to change dividends. Results are consistent with the joint hypotheses that Japanese firms, particularly keiretsu-member firms, face less information asymmetry and fewer agency conf licts than U.S. firms, and that information asymmetries and0or agency conf licts affect dividend policy. Japanese firms experience smaller stock price reactions to dividend omissions and initiations, they are less reluctant to omit and cut dividends, and their dividends are more responsive to earnings changes.

Fundamentals or Market Movements: What Drives the Dividend Decision?

“…The Table also details the number of companies in the sample in every year as well as the dynamics of dividend decreases and the number of observations with unchanged dividends. The relative frequency of increases, decreases, and unchanged dividends is similar to the rates documented by Dewenter and Warther (1998) for the US and Japan and by Rahman (2002) …”

Dividend Policy of Jordanian Firms: Stability Tests and Survey Results

“…In other words, this paper attempts to examine if companies do not tend to increase dividends unless they believe that the increase in their profits is "permanent". This finding has also been supported by many papers including Cheung and Roy (1985), Lowntein and Kato (1995), Lasfer (1996), Dewenter and Warther (1998) As far as the stability issue of dividend policy is concerned, the empirical literature estimates two main models and these are referred to as the Lintner Model (1956) and Fama and Babiak Model (1968). These are outlined below.…”

Dividends and Problem of Separation of Ownership and Control: Theory and Evidence from French Firms

“…Benartzi, Michaely, and Thaler (1997) found that the model of Lintner (1956) is the best model that describes dividend policy. Therefore, and following the works of McDonald and Jacquillat Nussenbaum (1975), Shevlin (1982), Partington (1984), Leithner and Zimmerman (1993), Dewenter and Warther (1998), Robinson (2006) and Wang and David Scott (2011), we use the full adjustment model, the partial adjustment model, Waud and Earnings trend model formulated as follows as suggested by Short and al (2002), to describe the relationship between dividends and ownership structure:…”